[access-uk] Re: I'm outraged!

  • From: william lomas <lomaswilliam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:30:15 +0100

damon can we get lost with a.d. on the dvd's?
What amazes me is, it costs the bbc surely, and other providers a lot more to 
air it on tv, yet to put it on the dvd the a.d. that is for lost etc. as an 
extra track in y view would cost less.
I never got in to lost and other series on tv as a.d. was only on a scattering 
of episodes

On May 25, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Damon Rose wrote:

> I'd email you direct and fill you in on the geek stuff if I could work out 
> how to harvest your email address from this list. Drop me a mail 
> damon.rose@xxxxxxxxx and I'll answer these questions for you. We can also 
> have a chat about what you think of the ending. I'll be fasscinated. I won't 
> say another thing. 
> 
> I remember Therese Birch when she was on LBC before she got into this audio 
> description malarky. 
> 
> Is there a good audio description recommendation list or forum anywhere, 
> anyone? There ya go, I'm bringing the discussion back on message again - hope 
> you appreciate that Barry and all ;)
> 
> I saw a film on Sky Movies last night which sounded like a schoolgirl was 
> doing it. I was quite shocked. It was a bit like getting a talking book disk 
> through the mail and finding out it was read by a new zealand volunteer so 
> you just put it back in the post. 
> 
> ...Damon 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Vanja Sudar
> Sent: 25 May 2010 12:12
> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [access-uk] Re: I'm outraged!
> 
> Ah, so it was definitely live from ABC. Interesting! I'm curious what 
> happened during the commercials, IE. often when other sort of live simulcasts 
> from the US happen on UK TV or radio it ends up that US commercials are 
> longer or there are more breaks than here, so they have to fill in with other 
> content, so I wonder what happened during lost, or did sky somehow just 
> managed to get proper timing and correct number of commercials. OK, I'm being 
> geeky here...lol, but back to the subject, you're right Damon, I was very 
> disappointed. It's one of most unusual shows in TV history and if you've 
> watched it from the beginning it pretty much becomes part of your life. Yes, 
> some might call it sad, but I don't care. I just wish I was thinking like you 
> and assumed that it wouldn't be audio described during the first showing. 
> Glad you finally saw it, just please don't tell me how it ends *smiles* as 
> I'll try to watch it and hope that tonight's repeat will be audio described!
> Vanja
> http://www.sudar.co.uk
> http://twitter.com/internetking
> MSN/windows live messenger: sudar23@xxxxxxxxxxx
> AIM: vanja121
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Damon Rose" <damon.rose@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 7:02 PM
> Subject: [access-uk] Re: I'm outraged!
> 
> 
>> I do feel for poor old Vanja.
>> 
>> Just to reiterate, it was the very last episode of a long-running cult 
>> series which has broken the rules of TV and also become a web phenomenon.
>> 
>> There are literally millions of pages on the web theorising as to how 
>> the show is going to end.
>> 
>> We're on episode 122 now, the finale, and poor old Vanja got up at 5am 
>> to watch it being simulcast on UK and US television. Another very 
>> unusual 'must see' event they created early this morning.
>> 
>> I would've been terribly disappointed had I got up at 5am. I did 
>> consider it but had already guessed that the first showing wouldn't be 
>> audio described. My girlfriend and I were watching it earlier, 
>> incidentally, and it says "live from the US" on screen every 5 minutes 
>> or so. So it was a live feed coming from ABC in the states; hardly 
>> surprising Sky had no opportunity to get it described.
>> 
>> Good debate though and I believe we should be expecting a high service. 
>> I'm hoping that more than 6% of tv shows are to be described when 
>> Ofcom goes through its data. Unless I've already missed the outcome.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>> Behalf Of Scott C
>> Sent: 24 May 2010 22:59
>> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [access-uk] Re: I'm outraged!
>> 
>> But your missing the point Sack.
>> 
>> It wasn't just one show.
>> 
>> It was the show.
>> 
>> It was the mane show the big one so to speak.
>> 
>> Ta Scott.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Saqib - Email Address: saqib@xxxxxxxxxxxx Sent On: 24/05/2010 
>> 06:54 Sent To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Email Address: 
>> access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [access-uk] Re: I'm outraged!
>> 
>> Hi Mike. It wasn't the actual message that got my goat this morning. 
>> It was the tone of it. Of course we should be on a level playing field 
>> as our sighted counter parts on numerous levels and that includes 
>> transport and general technology. What I was trying to get across was 
>> that it's not a huge catastrophy if something wasn't recorded in AD 
>> for one episode. There have been plenty of ocations where Corrie 
>> hasn't been recorded with AD and yes it's a nucense on a entertainment 
>> level but hay as I said we can't always have it our way. I'm not 
>> saying that people should put up with this if such errors are made on 
>> a regular basis but if its the odd program once in a while then I don't 
>> think it's a huge deal for me personally.
>> Original message:
>>> I have to say first that I can sympathise with Saqib, that a sense of 
>>> proportion is always useful.  Perhaps keep 'outrage' for the 
>>> genuinely outrageous, like the arrest, detention, torture and 
>>> generalised persecution of blind political activists in China or the 
>>> necessity for Blind and other Disabled People to beg in order to 
>>> survive in many majority world countries!
>>> Nonetheless, I too can see Scott's point.  TV is  a comparatively 
>>> recent invention.  AD is there to remove the barriers that we as 
>>> Blind Disabled People experience when accessing it.  It is perfectly 
>>> acceptable to expect it to be there .  It is not something in the 
>>> 21st century for which we should feel grateful or thankful, any more 
>>> than we should for the removal of any other barrier which, if left in 
>>> place, Leeds to our segregation or exclusion.
>> 
>>> Saqib I agree that 'outraged' is perhaps a tad O.T.T, but then I have 
>>> no idea what 'Lost' is and therefore don't feel that strongly about 
>>> it on a personal level.  If I did and was trying to follow it, I 
>>> might feel  more angry that the AD which aught to have been part of 
>>> the broadcast was omitted.
>> 
>>> Our expectations of equal treatment  as Blind People, including the 
>>> provision of AD, should not be tempered by gratitude or any sense of 
>>> diffidence.  We strive to be equal citizens with the right to be 
>>> included and treated equally, in the society in which we live.  Where 
>>> it is typical for people to be able to access such facilities as 
>>> colour TV, why should Blind People have to tolerate any less than 
>>> equivalent reliable treatment than those with sight.
>>> Best wishes,
>> 
>>> Mike Higgins,
>>> Email: m.j.higgins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
>>> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
>>> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>>> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> ** and in the Subject line type
>>> ** unsubscribe
>>> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
>>> ** immediately-following link:-
>>> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
>>> ** or send a message, to
>>> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>> 
>> --
>> Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network.  Visit 
>> www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
>> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
>> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ** and in the Subject line type
>> ** unsubscribe
>> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
>> ** immediately-following link:-
>> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
>> ** or send a message, to
>> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq 
>> Nj…²‰žŠvz¢Â–™¶qºªµz¶‚¹®!Š
>> žz¶±j±¶qºªµz¶Šy–·ºn‰¢…Š
>> ¢¹²jžyr¶š‰—–ŠŠj¡z’¹~–²²
>> 
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/
>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain 
>> personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
>> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
>> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in 
>> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
>> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>> 
>> Nj…²‰žŠvz¢Â–™¶qºªµz¶‚¹®!Šžz¶±j±¶qºªµz¶Šy–·ºn‰¢…Š¢¹²jžyr¶š‰—–ŠŠj¡
>> z’¹~–²²
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
> 
> 
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal 
> views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance 
> on it and notify the sender immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>                                       
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq

** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq

Other related posts: