damon can we get lost with a.d. on the dvd's? What amazes me is, it costs the bbc surely, and other providers a lot more to air it on tv, yet to put it on the dvd the a.d. that is for lost etc. as an extra track in y view would cost less. I never got in to lost and other series on tv as a.d. was only on a scattering of episodes On May 25, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Damon Rose wrote: > I'd email you direct and fill you in on the geek stuff if I could work out > how to harvest your email address from this list. Drop me a mail > damon.rose@xxxxxxxxx and I'll answer these questions for you. We can also > have a chat about what you think of the ending. I'll be fasscinated. I won't > say another thing. > > I remember Therese Birch when she was on LBC before she got into this audio > description malarky. > > Is there a good audio description recommendation list or forum anywhere, > anyone? There ya go, I'm bringing the discussion back on message again - hope > you appreciate that Barry and all ;) > > I saw a film on Sky Movies last night which sounded like a schoolgirl was > doing it. I was quite shocked. It was a bit like getting a talking book disk > through the mail and finding out it was read by a new zealand volunteer so > you just put it back in the post. > > ...Damon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Vanja Sudar > Sent: 25 May 2010 12:12 > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [access-uk] Re: I'm outraged! > > Ah, so it was definitely live from ABC. Interesting! I'm curious what > happened during the commercials, IE. often when other sort of live simulcasts > from the US happen on UK TV or radio it ends up that US commercials are > longer or there are more breaks than here, so they have to fill in with other > content, so I wonder what happened during lost, or did sky somehow just > managed to get proper timing and correct number of commercials. OK, I'm being > geeky here...lol, but back to the subject, you're right Damon, I was very > disappointed. It's one of most unusual shows in TV history and if you've > watched it from the beginning it pretty much becomes part of your life. Yes, > some might call it sad, but I don't care. I just wish I was thinking like you > and assumed that it wouldn't be audio described during the first showing. > Glad you finally saw it, just please don't tell me how it ends *smiles* as > I'll try to watch it and hope that tonight's repeat will be audio described! > Vanja > http://www.sudar.co.uk > http://twitter.com/internetking > MSN/windows live messenger: sudar23@xxxxxxxxxxx > AIM: vanja121 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Damon Rose" <damon.rose@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 7:02 PM > Subject: [access-uk] Re: I'm outraged! > > >> I do feel for poor old Vanja. >> >> Just to reiterate, it was the very last episode of a long-running cult >> series which has broken the rules of TV and also become a web phenomenon. >> >> There are literally millions of pages on the web theorising as to how >> the show is going to end. >> >> We're on episode 122 now, the finale, and poor old Vanja got up at 5am >> to watch it being simulcast on UK and US television. Another very >> unusual 'must see' event they created early this morning. >> >> I would've been terribly disappointed had I got up at 5am. I did >> consider it but had already guessed that the first showing wouldn't be >> audio described. My girlfriend and I were watching it earlier, >> incidentally, and it says "live from the US" on screen every 5 minutes >> or so. So it was a live feed coming from ABC in the states; hardly >> surprising Sky had no opportunity to get it described. >> >> Good debate though and I believe we should be expecting a high service. >> I'm hoping that more than 6% of tv shows are to be described when >> Ofcom goes through its data. Unless I've already missed the outcome. >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Scott C >> Sent: 24 May 2010 22:59 >> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [access-uk] Re: I'm outraged! >> >> But your missing the point Sack. >> >> It wasn't just one show. >> >> It was the show. >> >> It was the mane show the big one so to speak. >> >> Ta Scott. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Saqib - Email Address: saqib@xxxxxxxxxxxx Sent On: 24/05/2010 >> 06:54 Sent To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Email Address: >> access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [access-uk] Re: I'm outraged! >> >> Hi Mike. It wasn't the actual message that got my goat this morning. >> It was the tone of it. Of course we should be on a level playing field >> as our sighted counter parts on numerous levels and that includes >> transport and general technology. What I was trying to get across was >> that it's not a huge catastrophy if something wasn't recorded in AD >> for one episode. There have been plenty of ocations where Corrie >> hasn't been recorded with AD and yes it's a nucense on a entertainment >> level but hay as I said we can't always have it our way. I'm not >> saying that people should put up with this if such errors are made on >> a regular basis but if its the odd program once in a while then I don't >> think it's a huge deal for me personally. >> Original message: >>> I have to say first that I can sympathise with Saqib, that a sense of >>> proportion is always useful. Perhaps keep 'outrage' for the >>> genuinely outrageous, like the arrest, detention, torture and >>> generalised persecution of blind political activists in China or the >>> necessity for Blind and other Disabled People to beg in order to >>> survive in many majority world countries! >>> Nonetheless, I too can see Scott's point. TV is a comparatively >>> recent invention. AD is there to remove the barriers that we as >>> Blind Disabled People experience when accessing it. It is perfectly >>> acceptable to expect it to be there . It is not something in the >>> 21st century for which we should feel grateful or thankful, any more >>> than we should for the removal of any other barrier which, if left in >>> place, Leeds to our segregation or exclusion. >> >>> Saqib I agree that 'outraged' is perhaps a tad O.T.T, but then I have >>> no idea what 'Lost' is and therefore don't feel that strongly about >>> it on a personal level. If I did and was trying to follow it, I >>> might feel more angry that the AD which aught to have been part of >>> the broadcast was omitted. >> >>> Our expectations of equal treatment as Blind People, including the >>> provision of AD, should not be tempered by gratitude or any sense of >>> diffidence. We strive to be equal citizens with the right to be >>> included and treated equally, in the society in which we live. Where >>> it is typical for people to be able to access such facilities as >>> colour TV, why should Blind People have to tolerate any less than >>> equivalent reliable treatment than those with sight. >>> Best wishes, >> >>> Mike Higgins, >>> Email: m.j.higgins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- >>> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] >>> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: >>> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> ** and in the Subject line type >>> ** unsubscribe >>> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the >>> ** immediately-following link:- >>> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] >>> ** or send a message, to >>> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq >> >> -- >> Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network. Visit >> www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere. >> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- >> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] >> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: >> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> ** and in the Subject line type >> ** unsubscribe >> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the >> ** immediately-following link:- >> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] >> ** or send a message, to >> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq >> Nj…²‰žŠvz¢Â–™¶qºªµz¶‚¹®!Å >> žz妱j±¶qºªµz¶ÂÅ y–·ºn‰¢…Š>> ¢Â¹²jžyr¶š‰—–ŠŠj¡z’¹~–²² >> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/ >> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain >> personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. >> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. >> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in >> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. >> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. >> Further communication will signify your consent to this. >> >> Nj…²‰žŠvz¢Â–™¶qºªµz¶‚¹®!Šžz¶±j±¶qºªµz¶Šy–·ºn‰¢…Š¢¹²jžyr¶š‰—–ŠŠj¡ >> z’¹~–²² > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > ** and in the Subject line type > ** unsubscribe > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the > ** immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] > ** or send a message, to > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq > > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/ > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal > views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance > on it and notify the sender immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to this. > > ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] > ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > ** and in the Subject line type > ** unsubscribe > ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the > ** immediately-following link:- > ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] > ** or send a message, to > ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq