[access-uk] Re: Fw: Response from Lloyds TSB re chip & pin at home
- From: "Colin Fowler" <col.fowler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 06:33:32 +0100
Steve,
Because they have to be considered in context! The context being "not being
treated at a disadvantage compared with others...."
Obviously the principal of being treated at a disadvantage in respect to the
security implications is beyond the simple comprehension of some on this
list!
Colin Fowler
Disability Consultant
Tel: 01582 483 283
Text/mobile: 07901 573 570
E mail:
col.fowler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.social-model.org.uk
disability@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Nutt" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 9:18 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Fw: Response from Lloyds TSB re chip & pin at home
> Hi Derek,
>
> Thanks for that, a nice clear explanation. Why don't people get the words
> reasonable and adjustment and settle for it sometimes?
>
> All the best
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of
> Derek Hornby
> Sent: 21 May 2007 20:35
> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Fw: Response from Lloyds TSB re chip & pin at
> home
>
> Colin said:
> "You're guaranteed against fraud already provided you can evidence
> that you did not purposely allow your online details to be compromised.
> So what is the reasonable adjustment there?"
>
> Ok the bank can say:
> "here is your key pad you must use it"
>
> You can't, because blind.
> So the bank says:
> "ok as you can't use the key pad we will let you stay with old set-up."
> Reasonable adjustment!
> I think the point is, the key pads simply are aimed to cut the bank's
> losses.
> But at end of the day allowing us to stay with present system makes
> no difference to us, it just means the bank is willing to take the
> extra risk, but only for those that can't use the key pads.
>
> It's like chip & PIN in the shops. The banks would prefer
> everyone to use chip & Pin in the shops, but some people can't.
> So chip & signature is available.
> But those that use chip & signature, the banks take on the extra risk.
> Regards,
> Derek
>
> e-mail: derek.hornby_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>
>
>
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>
>
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
Other related posts:
