Hello Derek, I am sorry to see that you are at it again. I send what I believe is a constructive note to the list and you then respond in your own manner. Why am I "lazy" because you disagree with my view? At work top posting is the normal convention that I have come across in many companies. People are expected to know the topic being discussed or to take the time to read the bottom first. You have make comparisons with conversation and book reading. In fact despite the fact that all 3 use words there is little direct connection between them. A conversation is a direct two way interchange in real time. An e-mail is, by its very nature, not in real time and so can be handled in a different manner if required. Reading a book from start to finish is fine. Do you therefore imply that on each e-mail you want to read the many earlier notes each time before you get to the new bits? That, again, is not a practical suggestion. Now, as far as eating food with one's fingers, how did you manage to jump to that? Or were you trying to make some sort of outlandish connection. In fact that too wood not make much sense as you would finish up with fairly messy hands and would then need to take out more time and trouble cleaning yourself up. It would not be easier at all. Please believe me Derek, that there are others on this list who also have valid contributions to make. Regards, John Contact on : (Home) john_farley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx or : (work) john.farley@xxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Derek Hornby Sent: 26 May 2007 13:10 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: Top Posting to this list Hi John >It is much easier to follow with top posting; if the person thinks it is >necessary to add context from an earlier note , then addict, with lines >saying "quote start" and "quote en". The only problem with quoting, is when there is far too much quoted. Top-posting makes posts incomprehensible. Why? Because In normal conversations, one does not answer to something that has not yet been said. So it is unclear to reply to the top, whilst the original message is at the bottom. also consider a book is normally read from top to bottom. Top-posting forces one to stray from this convention: Reading some at the top, skipping to the bottom to read the question, and going back to the top to continue. I think the real reason why some people like top posting they are too lazy to cut and snip irrelevant text. Do most blind people eat there dinner with their fingers, on the grounds it's easier than using a knive and fork? So just because a task is easer, doens t make it better. Regards, Derek e-mail: derek.hornby_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq