[access-uk] Re: Discrimination or simple comon sence.

  • From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:18:41 -0000

Hi,

Here is another person who can't believe the stupidity of the situation.  
Actually, I can believe it only too well, but here we go.

I work in a busy office on two floors; I have to go from one floor to the other 
regularly.  No health and safety issues have been raised.  If you are faced 
with a fire in a building I would hope everyone would use common sense and help 
each other to get out as safely as possible!

Let us know how this progresses.

I am not sure whether this counts as discrimination or just a pure lack of 
knollege/someone trying to proove themselves useful?

Thanks.
Andrew.


-----Original Message-----
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Andy
Sent: Wed 02/03/2005 20:19
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Discrimination or simple comon sence.
 
Hi all.

I have just secured a social workers post with a Scottish Local Authority 
and Access to Work are planning an I.T assessment to ascertained my 
technology needs.  In addition to these, I was advised by Access to Work to 
arrange a Health and Safety Assessment be undertaken by my new employer, and 
that a copy of this be sent to ATW.

Today, I visited my new place of work, where I am due to commence employment 
on 11th April, and met with a Health and Safety expert, who had been 
commissioned by his employer, the same local authority, to undertake the 
assessment.

I suffer from Retinitus Pigmentosa and I am Registered as Blind.  I do have 
some limited and confusing vision but generally, I can manage around a 
building/office with no assistance from my guide dog, orbeit, tentatively 
and slowly.

Well,  the Health and Safety specialist expressed concern about me being 
located on the second floor landing of the building.  He stated that in a 
case of a fire, I may hold up the flow of workers evacuating the building, 
on the stair well.  He added that he was concerned for my own well-being as 
well as my colleagues.

Despite advising him repeatedly that I can manage stairs fine and that I 
have never experienced any difficulties negotiating them, he remained 
concerned and concluded by advising my prospective line manager that he 
would be happier if the whole Community Care Team, some six workers, be 
re-located to the ground floor.  Alternatively, a second rout  of exit be 
built in the form of an external fire escape - the office has only one exit 
at present.


I was advised by my new line manager that the specialist had many years of 
experience behind him, but I could not stop myself from feeling 
discriminated against.  I don't believe that he has much experience of 
visual impairment and appeared to me to be not listening to my views.  He 
advised that the local authority had a duty of care not only to myself but 
to my fellow workers.  When I advised him that my job was not entirely 
office based and that I would be expected to get out and about, visiting 
clients in their own homes, flats, villas, terraces, day care centres, 
residential and nursing homes, sheltered housing complexes etc etc etc, he 
advised that he was not concerned about that.

Surely, if my new employer has a duty of care towards me this must include 
when out and about as one of their representatives.

In any case, his views have resulted in causing alarm to my new line manager 
and I'm convinced that if another visually impaired person was to be 
interviewed tomorrow, then they may have less of a chance of securing a 
post.

Am I simply over-reacting to this one person's views and being unreasonable 
myself?  Is the specialist discriminating against me?  Should I challenge 
his views and become a threat to my  new employer?

I intend to express my feelings in writing to begin with and express concern 
to my line manager about his limited experience of visual impairment and I 
would like a Rehabilitation Officer, from the same authority, to undertake a 
mobility assessment within the office block.  Does this sound reasonable 
folks, or as I said above, am I perhaps over-reacting?






Best wishes.
Andy from sunny Kilcreggan.

Drop me a wee line at:
andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq


Other related posts: