I don't know, for the life of me, why designers for blind products think we blind have no sense of style. It seems they deliberately take double advantage of us. As they know we are a small market, wanting access, as would anyone. So they feel as we haven't a choice they can get away with selling to us ugly products. If they thought of us as they think of themselves, they would realize if they wouldn't want to be seen with an ugly piece of equipment, neither would we. ----- Original Message ----- From: ANDY COLLINS To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 5:41 PM Subject: [access-uk] Cobolt compass, beware Hi all - Another waste of dosh! I think I paid about £35 for this, and it's a load of rubbish. My experience with it, found it to be both inaccurate and unpredictable. Like many things produce for blind people, it is also very ugly, and cheap looking/feeling. I'm not just banging the old drum of complaint against equipment produced for the blind. In fact, it saddens me to find yet again the same experience, of over-priced [but I do understand the niche market equals fewer sales argument] ugly build, hardly fit for purpose, assistive equipment. I always try to buy where I can, mainstream equipment, and figure out how to get the best from it, but sometimes, mainstream can be too non-accessible, and I am forced to go to the so-called specialists. It truly gives me no pleasure in bringing to the attention of the list this poor piece of specialist equipment, but I think we need to keep shouting for equality in product performance, reliability, and aesthetic appeal. I don't want big clunky stuff in my pockets, or around my house, just because it can talk, or give me some other kind of additional feedback. As I have said before on this list, the PTR1 was the most over-priced, mal-functioning, hugely ugly piece of junk, I've ever wasted 600 quid on. Sadly, I've wasted 35 on a useless compass, that thinks North is wherever it fancies, on any given day - Andy