OK, I am asking you to co ordinate the campaign, I am a member so I expect you to retract your inpolite comment forthwith ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Taylor To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:11 PM Subject: [access-uk] Re: BBC Iplayer Hi, As I said, an attempt was made on the radio list to get people to use BCAB to co-ordinate this, but nobody did, so BCAB hasn't been asked to do anything by its members. Frankly, if we don't support organisations, we can't expect them to do anything. Organisations incur expenses and need people to join, and one of the many benefits of joining is support on campaigns like this, but nobody can be bothered any more, so organisations don't have the clout they need to demonstrate numbers. You have choices, either participate and get things done, do it yourself as an isolated individual, or shut up and stop moaning. Organisations just don't magically do what you want, they do as their members vote, much more accountable, so if you want anyy help, you know what to do, join and raise it! ----- Original Message ----- From: Colin Fowler To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:02 PM Subject: [access-uk] Re: BBC Iplayer Hi Ray, You're absolutely right there. Where the difference here is though, is the simple fact that the BBC is a public authority, this development and the subsequent introduction of new applications is paid for by us as licence payers! The BBC have a statutory obligation to comply with their due regard for the equality of opportunity for disabled people, and I player as an application as it has been introduced and currently is available does not demonstrate that the BBC has in anyway complied with this. Now, if the BBC who have a statutory obligation to comply with legislation and don't bother, what message does that send out to application developers working in the private sector? This is a golden opportunity for those people disadvantaged by inaccessible applications to make a statement. We are not prepared to put up with this discriminatory behaviour any longer! So who's going to support this? individuals? the BCAB? the BCS? ----- Original Message ----- From: Rays Home To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 2:19 PM Subject: [access-uk] Re: BBC Iplayer Well Colin, yu've managed to find something at BCAB! I've just searched through this month's archive and didn't encounter anything about the new IPlayer. There is of course no defence of the IPlayer as it stands but so many large companies just never ever seem to integrate accessability into the design of software and websites. It always seems to be that occasionally something gets done, and then the issue is forgotten about and hasn't made its way into general practice of developer teams. I've no idea wether Ulie Schiller is VI or not; most likely not even though there are VI software writers in the mainstream if very rarely. Cheers, Ray. ----- Original Message ----- From: Colin Fowler Subject: [access-uk] Re: BBC Iplayer Hmmmmmm, and is Julie Shiller a screen reader user? Not another sighted person that uses a screen reader from a sighted persons perspective of testing applications? Eric Hugger is the head of future media and technology and Andrea Kalander the head of diversity, I think that we should be petitioning people with that seniority for improvements, after all they are answerable for any infringements to accessibility and equality. I've viewed the BCAB archive on the I Player thread, and apart from one message that demonstrated just what and how systemic the problem at the BBC is, there didn't seem to be anything of any more interest. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1575 - Release Date: 26/07/2008 16:18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1575 - Release Date: 26/07/2008 16:18