Your machine shouldn't have any trouble coping, it's true. Of course, it could be that we're barking up the wrong tree entirely with this line of thought. I'm inclined to agree that the Acapela voices are expensive though. Léonie. -- http://www.tink.co.uk/ _____ From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roy Bannister Sent: 20 October 2008 18:08 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: Acapela Voices. Hi Leonie, I do realise that concatonative voices are memory hungry. I would have thought the response on my machine with it's spec would have been better than I have found them. I have used other concatonative voices previously and found them smoother. I think the Acapela voices are rather expensive. This is purely my opinion, I am pleased I had the opportunity of evaluating them. Thanks for your interest. Good Luck, Roy. ----- Original Message ----- From: Léonie Watson <mailto:tink@xxxxxxxxxx> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 5:27 PM Subject: [access-uk] Re: Acapela Voices. It may not be the case here, but it's worth knowing that the Acapela voices use concatonative speech synthesis, as opposed to engines such as Eloquence, witch use formative speech synthesis. The trade off is between realism and responsiveness. Concatonative synthesis is based on recordings of real voices. Acapela use a form of concatonative synthesis known as unit selection synthesis. Essentially, this breaks down the real voice recordings into phones, syllables, words and phrases and stores them in a database. When text is converted into speech, the text is analysed and the resulting speech is built from the building blocks held in the database. Formative synthesis relies entirely on artificially generated sound. The upshot is that although concatonative synthesis sounds more real, it is often less responsive and prone to technical glitches. Formative synthesis sounds much less real, but tends to be more responsive. Léonie. -- http://www.tink.co.uk/ _____ From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roy Bannister Sent: 20 October 2008 09:41 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Acapela Voices. Thanks to Steve sending a demo disk of Acapela voices I have had a chance to try odd ones. I normally use Reed from Window-Eyes Eloquence, or Paul on Satogo Dectalk. I found Peter and Ryan were acceptable for reading text passages at a reasonable speed, found them slightly jerky with final syllables sometimes clipped. However when typing using either of them I find them rather sluggish, also the upper case letters are not announced in a higher pitch, I definitely don't care for this. I have Skread installed on my machine with Skype, using my normal voices, the Skread voice will announce details whilst the other voice may be reading something else, this doesn't happen with the Acapela voices, they are not trying to use the same voice. My machine is a dual core 2.8Gb processor with 1Gb of ram, this makes me suspect that the Acapela voices are memory hungry. I will be interested in other users verdicts. Cheers Roy roy.bannister@xxxxxxxxxxxx Skype: roybannister4787 _____ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.1/1734 - Release Date: 20/10/2008 07:25