[acc_tr_vsk] R: Re: Strategy for the UNT

  • From: "Piaggio, Marco" <marco.piaggio@xxxxxx>
  • To: "acc_tr_vsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <acc_tr_vsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:09:24 +0000

This is exactly what I think!

Da: acc_tr_vsk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:acc_tr_vsk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Per conto di Rick Schulze
Inviato: mercoledì 26 maggio 2010 13.09
A: acc_tr_vsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Oggetto: [acc_tr_vsk] Re: Strategy for the UNT

Hi friends, John, J-L,

I agree with John rapidly. I think that spirit and purpose of our meetings is 
to associate with friends, independently from the nationality, and to join in 
team races. I think, if we construct 2 (or more) teams we become getting a too 
large distance to the other team friends. And this cannot be the mind!! What 
was the problem yesterday? I saw none!
Expected Marcos probs with his server (not his fault!!!) we did sail seven 
races. And the fact, that two friends have to be in Spec during each race was, 
in my mind, ok. We all together had have contact and did have temperature even 
in the Spectator. Wasn't it?
Now we are eight members in UN and these are enough I think. Sometimes the one 
or other is absent (what reasons is not relevant) and so some pauses while 
races is very well for recreation (for example smoking :-)).
In this spirit

Cheers, Rick
----- Original Message -----
From: John Chambers<mailto:john.ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: acc_tr_vsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:acc_tr_vsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 12:11 PM
Subject: [acc_tr_vsk] Re: Strategy for the UNT

JL I repeat if you want a French team go ahead with my blessing but I still 
dont agree with the ITBYC rules, in the UN we can keep your Brilliant site as 
it is and for now make two teams of 4 and keep adding members untill we have 
enough for three teams of 4 and then five and so on ad infinitum, we can also 
at present "adjust the teams by swapping players to make an even challenge and 
to learn the strategies better, as ever this is just a suggestion and I wait to 
see what you all think.

Cheers, John.

--- On Wed, 26/5/10, jd-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <jd-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: jd-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <jd-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [acc_tr_vsk] Strategy for the UNT
To: acc_tr_vsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, 26 May, 2010, 8:28
Hi John, hi good fellows !

Thanks you Marco and Rick for the great competion you set up yesterday (i shall 
need a little bit time to put the scores lol)!

Thanks you John for your sincer feelback. I also had messages from other UNT 
mates which all rejected the idea i had launched. That is a important point 
because UNT is not mine but own to all us who give life to it.
Belower I however regive the problem we have to face together.

John said:
>            I want at first to be clear I consider ALL the UN team  equally as 
> comrades and mates but i think to make national teams is  not the way

All agree as I now agree too.

> i think we have  made a mistake to make one team too big, we can still make 
> two teams  of un mixed nationalities.

UNT becomes too large. That is the MAIN point. I wish that you say what you 
think, because in the site, we invit people to join. If we want to stop the 
recruitment, we have to delete this invitation. Do we want to stay no more than 
we are ? Do we want to stay open ?

I suggest an alternative: UNT stays as now (8 skippers) but its site and 
mailing list can be used to ease to found and to organize new teams. What do 
you think ?



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2895 - Release Date: 05/25/10 

Other related posts: