While I'm no lawyer, the GPL says that the kernel is free. However, section 1 of the GPL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html) reads: > You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and > you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee. So, SuSE is quite within their rights to charge for making you a copy. That said, they DO have mirrors where you can freely download the ISOs for their distro. Working with a company where part of my job is working on proprietary cryptographic code, and the other part is working on an open-sourced Linux device driver for the same cryptographic device, I have to say that the line between the two has to be kept very clear, and from that, I wanted to note that while the Linux kernel IS GPLed, work utilizing it (such as OpenOffice) is not necessarily. So, to answer your last question: there is not, and cannot, be a closed-source version of the Linux kernel as that would violate the GPL. Fuzzy -- Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur. Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes. Vir sapit qui pauca loquitur. Cras amet qui numquam amavit, quique amavit cras plus amet. Uno itinere non potest perveniri ad tam grande secretum. On Mon, 5 May 2003, Ron Allen wrote: > I thought -- and, please, someone correct me if needed -- that to be in > compliance with the copyright law in regards to all distros of Linux > that it has to be free for the taking. That's what open source is all > about. > > I suppose I could do my own research, but this is something others on > the list may be interested in and someone here already knows the answer. > Is it that they don't offer ISO downloads, and so you have to compile > your own executables? Or is this a closed-source version of Linux? > > Thanks, > > Ron For a web-based membership management utility and information on list policies, please see http://nibec.com/24hoursupport/ To unsubscribe, send a blank email to 24hoursupport-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" (without quotes) in the subject.