Posts for wittrsamr, 04-2010

  1. Home
  2. wittrsamr
  3. Archive
  4. 04-2010

Browse: Last Month: 03-2010    Main Archive Page    Next Month: 05-2010

By Date / By Date Reverse / By Threads

  1. » [Wittrs] Dancing Dualisms: Two Modes of Existence, Joseph Polanik
  2. » [Wittrs] Re: Further Thoughts on Dennett, Searle and the Conundrum of Dualism, Gordon Swobe
  3. » [Wittrs] The Alleged 4th Premise: Is the CRA Valid?, Joseph Polanik
  4. » [Wittrs] The Alleged 4th Premise: Alternate Grounds for the Third Premise, Joseph Polanik
  5. » [Wittrs] Eliminative Materialism, Gordon Swobe
  6. » [Wittrs] Wittgenstein on Inner/Outer and Behaviorism, Sean Wilson
  7. » [Wittrs] Wittgenstein Workshop: Conant & Dain, Sean Wilson
  8. » [Wittrs] What would Wittgenstein have said?, Rajasekhar Goteti
  9. » [Wittrs] The CRA: Is the Third Premise True?, Joseph Polanik
  10. » [Wittrs] Re: What Is Ontological Dualism?, Gordon Swobe
  11. » [Wittrs] What is consciousness, Rajasekhar Goteti
  12. » [Wittrs] Searching for Evidence of Claims of Self-Evidencing Truth, Joseph Polanik
  13. » [Wittrs] Re: Conscious vs. Unconscious Understanding, Gordon Swobe
  14. » [Wittrs] Is the CRA a Logically Valid Argument?, Joseph Polanik
  15. » [Wittrs] Is the Third Axiom True?, Joseph Polanik
  16. » [Wittrs] Wittgenstein Workshop, Sean Wilson
  17. » [Wittrs] posting to the wrong group addy, Sean Wilson
  18. » [Wittrs] Re: The Meaning of Knowing Meanings, Gordon Swobe
  19. » [Wittrs] Re: The Problem for Dennett, Rajasekhar Goteti
  20. » [Wittrs] Ignorance, Rajasekhar Goteti
  21. » [Wittrs] formal arguments, Gordon Swobe
  22. » [Wittrs] My Chinese Encyclopedia, Gordon Swobe
  23. » [Wittrs] XIII. Clarification: Logic's Meaning of 'Meaning', and Indefinable Signs, Rajasekhar Goteti
  24. » [Wittrs] Objectivity is our shared subjectivity, Rajasekhar Goteti
  25. » [Wittrs] Bogus Claim 3: Argument Validity Depends on Axiom Truth, Joseph Polanik
  26. » [Wittrs] Bogus Claim 2: Dennett Agrees With Mirsky on Defining Cartesian Dualism, Joseph Polanik
  27. » [Wittrs] Bogus Claim 4: Searle is Refuted by Redefining 'Understanding', Joseph Polanik
  28. » [Wittrs] Are We Actually Going to Discuss Searle's Reasoning Now?, Joseph Polanik
  29. » [Wittrs] Did Bruce's Message Make it?, Sean Wilson
  30. » [Wittrs] Bogus Claim 5: Searle Contradicts Himself, Joseph Polanik
  31. » [Wittrs] testing, one two, Sean Wilson
  32. » [Wittrs] Bogus Claim 6: The Third Axiom is not Conceptually True, Joseph Polanik
  33. » [Wittrs] The CRA in Symbolic Form (According to Joe), Joseph Polanik
  34. » [Wittrs] Re: Did Religion Affect the Tractatus?, College Dropout John O'Connor
  35. » [Wittrs] Constitution vs Causation, Joseph Polanik