[zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- From: Mario <mario.prato@xxxxxxxx>
- To: zxspectrum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:35:25 +0100
Sul mio (48K) c'e` un solo romcs sul contatto B25. Su quelli con due
rom, vedo che ci sono il ROMCS1 (A4) ed il ROMCS2 (B15). A parte che
non capisco perche` non abbiano mantenuto uno dei due sul
preesistente ROMCS unico, la mia domanda e` la seguente: per
minimizzare l'hardware, ho pensato di lasciare il mio segnale di
disabilitazione collegato FISSO al contatto A4 (ROMCS1, che nel 48K
non e` collegato a nulla) e prevedere un ponticello che serva a
collegarlo alternativamente al B25 (per il 48/128/+2) oppure al B15
(per il +2A/+3).
non so molto del +2A e del +3 ma veramente hanno 2 rom? perche' non una sola?
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Logos Finanziaria SPA. Società di credito ad erogazione diretta. Fino a 30.000
euro in 24 ore! Clicca e scopri come
*
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=2909&d=23-2
- Follow-Ups:
- [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- From: Alessandro Poppi
- References:
- [zxspectrum] zxmmc
- From: Alessandro Poppi
Other related posts:
- » [zxspectrum] zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- » [zxspectrum] zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
- » [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc+
Sul mio (48K) c'e` un solo romcs sul contatto B25. Su quelli con due rom, vedo che ci sono il ROMCS1 (A4) ed il ROMCS2 (B15). A parte che non capisco perche` non abbiano mantenuto uno dei due sul preesistente ROMCS unico, la mia domanda e` la seguente: per minimizzare l'hardware, ho pensato di lasciare il mio segnale di disabilitazione collegato FISSO al contatto A4 (ROMCS1, che nel 48K non e` collegato a nulla) e prevedere un ponticello che serva a collegarlo alternativamente al B25 (per il 48/128/+2) oppure al B15 (per il +2A/+3).
- [zxspectrum] Re: zxmmc
- From: Alessandro Poppi
- [zxspectrum] zxmmc
- From: Alessandro Poppi