Reply to note from Harry Binswanger <hb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:13:19 -0500 > >Wasn't a lot of the success in running Xy on XP and Vista -- > >with best results -- associated with using that substitute > >command processor recommended by Robert ? > > No, I don't think so. I use Xy successfully on XP w/o kmd.exe. Harry, you're right, there's no connection. Years ago, we bundled KMD.EXE with XYWWWEB.U2, mainly for compatibility with Windows 95 and 97, as they did not have the CMD.EXE command interpreter that comes with later versions of Windows. Future releases of U2 will not need or rely on KMD.EXE, as the OSes that required it are no more. -- Carl Distefano cld@xxxxxxxxxx