Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7
- From: Michael Norman <michael.norman@xxxxxxx>
- To: xywrite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,xywrite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 18:02:23 -0400
At 03:26 PM 5/3/2010, J R FOX wrote:
I suspect most of the people on this list -- just as in the case of most of the people I know -- are still in a 'Why Go There ?' mode, as regards 64 bit. Maybe if I was putting together a quad-core screamer . . . . But nothing I'm doing now, up to and including various things with video streams, really require it. (Robert might have a different take on that.) Certainly nothing with everyday business apps. I suppose it would be a different story if the 32-bit OS-es were suddenly to go away. But regular XP is still very prevalently in use, and I don't see this happening all that soon.
Thanks, Jordan. I'm going to get WIN7/32.Michael Norman
- References:
- 64 or 32 bit Win 7
- From: Michael Norman
- Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7
- From: J R FOX
- 64 or 32 bit Win 7
Other related posts:
- » 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Michael Norman
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - J R FOX
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Michael Norman
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Robert Holmgren
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Kari Eveli
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Robert Holmgren
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Bill Troop
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Kari Eveli
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Robert Orndorff
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Robert Holmgren
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Robert Holmgren
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - J R FOX
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Paul Lagasse
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Robert Holmgren
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Raphael Tennenbaum
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Raphael Tennenbaum
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Robert Holmgren
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Kari Eveli
- » Re: 64 or 32 bit Win 7 - Harry Binswanger