[x500standard] Re: bindingType of ModifyOperationalBindingArgument
- From: "Jean-Paul LEMAIRE" <jean-paul.lemaire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: x500standard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:53:00 +0100
Hi Erik,
The modifyOperationalBinding can modify the parameters of the binding
but not the binding type. The binding type shall be present in the
sequence because the parameters depend on it (with a constraint
between components). It seems that a DSA should reject a modification
on existing bindind with a different bindingType as the bindingType
used in establishOperationalBinding. A similar rule should applied to
terminateOperationalBinding.
Regards
Jean-Paul.
Am I right when assuming that the bindingType cannot be changed by
the
ModifyOperationalArgument?
If I am right, the bindingType shall the one that is associated with
the
bindingID. That should be stated clearly.
I am waiting eagerly for an expert answer.
Erik Andersen
Andersen's L-Service
Elsevej 48,
DK-3500 Vaerloese
Denmark
Mobile: +45 2097 1490
e-amail: era@xxxxxxx
Skype: andersen-erik
http://www.x500.eu/
http://www.x500standard.com/
<http://dk.linkedin.com/in/andersenerik>
http://dk.linkedin.com/in/andersenerik
-----
www.x500standard.com: The central source for information on the X.500 Directory
Standard.
Other related posts:
