Brendan: I am terribly confused. Here is what you write: "I'm afraid I don't understand why duckrabbit with a frame of Jackie Chan is a mistake, if It doesn't suit you tastes it could be substituted for any vid. My duckrabbit is an EXACT example of Wittgenstein method and Questions. In no way does it disrespects W ideas. It is an exellecent example of Socratic midwifery(method) and a leading question. also of Pyrrhonian scepticism(Pyro wrote a list of books e.g. scepticism about definitions, mathematics ,knowledge etc and showed us when framed lead to an infinite regress.) Also a great example of paradox's. Set up a logical paradox and put these examples into the equation and we Philosophical investigations. " From what I can see -- unless I'm missing something -- you posted a video clip to a Jackie Chan movie. I don't see the relevance of anything here. And I am now wondering whether all these posts you are sending to the list are really helpful to anything we have assembled ourselves for. May I ask that you give further thoughts to your offerings before sending them? Regards. ----- Original Message ---- From: Sean Wilson <whoooo26505@xxxxxxxxx> To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 12:14:08 PM Subject: [Wittrs] Re: duckrabbit part 1 ... Brendan: that was a Jackie Chan video. Was that posted by mistake? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com WEB VIEW: http://tinyurl.com/ku7ga4 TODAY: http://alturl.com/whcf 3 DAYS: http://alturl.com/d9vz 1 WEEK: http://alturl.com/yeza GOOGLE: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs YAHOO: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/ FREELIST: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009