[Wittrs] Re: When is "brain talk" really dualism?
- From: "Cayuse" <z.z7@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:11:39 +0100
Stuart wrote:
> Cayuse wrote:
>> I think that his approach leads to a conclusion that the idea of "subjective
>> experience" has no application.
>
> So you think he would have said that there is no point in ever using a term
> like "subjective experience"
> to differentiate experiences we have that can be shared from those that can't?
>
> Can you offer something in support of WHY you think as you do, either some
> argument or some direct quotes from him where he said as much?
I'm not aware of LW mentioning "subjective experience" anywhere but then I've
only read the TLP and the PI. If he does then I'd appreciate the reference.
Just as there is a conceptual host organism associated with the "visual room",
so it is assumed that there is a "visual room" associated with any other person
within this room. But nothing would be any different if that assumption were
wrong. It has no application.
Other related posts:
