[Wittrs] Re: Russell or Wittgenstein?

  • From: brendan downs <downs_brendan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:06:06 +1200

he tells us he refutes his own work but doesnt. Have a look at the first 
paragraph of PI, hes giving you a first grade definition/description of logical 
atomism!!!???

Brendan
 
> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:37:14 +0000
> From: jrstern@xxxxxxxxx
> To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Wittrs] Re: Russell or Wittgenstein?
> 
> --- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, brendan downs <wittrs@...> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Why refute your own work??? 
> 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> WEB VIEW: http://tinyurl.com/ku7ga4
> TODAY: http://alturl.com/whcf
> 3 DAYS: http://alturl.com/d9vz
> 1 WEEK: http://alturl.com/yeza
> GOOGLE: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs
> YAHOO: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/
> FREELIST: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009
> 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Find a way to cure that travel bug MSN NZ Travel
http://travel.msn.co.nz/

Other related posts: