[Wittrs] Re: Following a Rule
- From: "jrstern" <jrstern@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:12:40 -0000
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "jrstern" <jrstern@> wrote:
>
> > Let's start with something where you feel happy stipulating
> > to the fact that it is a computer.
>
> You seem to have missed the point I was trying to make, though my
> post seems to have stirred up discussion.
Well, then I've still missed it, discussion and all.
> > Can a computer have original intentionality, without computing?
>
> Our current computers cannot have original intentionality with or
> without computing.
We agree on half, then.
And I wasn't arguing the other half at the moment.
Josh
WEB VIEW: http://tinyurl.com/ku7ga4
TODAY: http://alturl.com/whcf
3 DAYS: http://alturl.com/d9vz
1 WEEK: http://alturl.com/yeza
GOOGLE: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs
YAHOO: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/
FREELIST: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009
Other related posts:
