[wisehat] Wise Hat News #12

  • From: Wise Hat News <news@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wisehat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:01:53 +0900

Wise Hat News #12
20th July 2005

The online version is available at:

1. High Crimes and Misdemeanours
2. Searching for Mrs Macbeth
3. Hello Mr Steiner
4. Almost Like Clockwork
5. What's New?
6. Freedom In Education
7. Administrivia

Image Link: http://www.worldtribunal.org/main/?


"## War is the spectacular and bloody projection of our everyday living. ##"

The World Tribunal On Iraq recently drew to a close. I wonder if it can
be the last. It was the 21st meeting held in the last two years. It has
documented in gutting detail the ongoing tragedy that is Iraq. This is a
tragedy for humanity, for the whole world. As Juror Arundhati Roy said:

“The assault on Iraq is an assault on all of us: on our dignity, our
intelligence, and our future.”

But if we are under assault what can we do? This time around I intend to
examine this question. I wonder to what extent you will agree with my


PS The words above and the words below were written some time before the
terrible events that took place in London, a city I lived in for several
years. The global media coverage of the bombings in London lies in stark
contrast to reports of Iraq. I'd like bombing in all forms to be
considered as crimes against humanity. I think the degree to which
authority is adhered to unquestioningly contributes to suffering and
violence. We all need to be careful about what and who we believe in and


"## Education through the World has failed. It has produced mounting
destruction and misery. ##"

Tragedy. What a feeble and convenient word I used. How easy to wash and
wring our hands, sigh and do nothing. Somehow the word tragedy is so
vast it is hollow, empty and lifeless. We cannot respond, we do not need
to respond because the issue confronting us is too big and difficult. It
is beyond our control and being beyond our control we have an excuse and
are excused.

Even Mrs Macbeth was more self-aware than this.

How often do we even look at our hands, never mind try and scrub the
blood from them? How many of us can even see the blood, never mind taste
it, never mind smell it. Am I being melodramatic again? Never mind, the
blood is there.

Until we really look at what we do and do not do as individuals can we
really make any progress towards eradicating war and injustice? Unless
we look deeply and openly at ourselves how can we expect to make the
world a better place. How can we expect our actions to bring the results
we so often say we desire?

We need to be careful. By looking I do not mean judging. What's that old
cry about no-one being innocent? This is just another excuse and has too
often been used to justify killing. So, when I say look, I mean careful
observation, without excuse, justification or vindication.

Through the conscious act of looking we can begin to see the assault. We
begin to see the process of the assault and our own part within that
process. Once we expose the process we transform it. Let me do my best
to give you an example by looking in detail at some teaching experiences
I have had recently.


"## To create a new society each one of us has to be a true teacher,
which means that we will have to be both master and pupil; we have to
educate ourselves. ##"

Recently I attended a workshop conducted by Professor Christoph Jaffke
focusing on foreign language teaching in Waldorf Schools. I was very
impressed and was fortunate enough to be able to attend a second
workshop and observe an actual lesson in a Japanese elementary school.

The first Waldorf School was founded by Rudloph Steiner in 1919 in
Stuttgart. Children attending the school were required to learn not one
but two foreign languages from the first year. Steiner believed that it
was essential that children learn foreign languages to escape the
confines of their native tongue. Foreign languages were key to escape
the narrowing tendencies of Nationalism and essential in widening the
horizon of the mind and spirit.

Steiner also believed that learning should be natural. He determined
that foreign languages should be learned through focusing on rhyme and
rhythm and experiencing these physically. For this reason reading and
writing were to be delayed until the fourth year at which point the
children would have a rich vocabulary, strong linguistic grounding and
intuitive understanding of the target languages. Interestingly, he
remained pragmatic about what those languages should be.

During the workshop Professor Jaffke led us through a formidable array
of songs, chants and musical games. Some of the material had strong
echoes from my childhood - Steiner also believed in the importance of
using authentic material. Much of the material was unknown to me and
though gripping at the time I found it to be fleeting in my memory. The
next day, for example, I found it difficult to recall anything in its
entirety. Moreover, I noticed that many of the chants involved the
concept of left and right and I noticed that I was often muddling these
up. I was overloaded. Having said this, I noticed that in a video clip
of first grade children performing the same songs they seemed to have no
problem. One reason was undoubtedly because they had done the songs
multiple times. Rather than having one lesson a week, the children had
been receiving four or five short lessons. Frequent exposure to the
target language is much more natural.

The children in the video were sharp. They gave spirited performances
and their English sounded quite natural. However, the video didn't show
everything. The details I noticed in the real classroom were different.


"## The following of authority is the denial of intelligence. ##"

The lesson began and ended exactly on time. It took place after the
children's usual school day. As the echo of the school bell died away so
the lesson came to being. Somehow all the children were sitting upright,
ready and attentive, apart from one boy. I noticed that professor Jaffke
used the duration of the school bell to make little adjustments. One of
them was to straighten the chair of the boy so that it became parallel
with all the others. He did this while the boy was sitting in the chair.
I kept my eye on the boy.

For a good part of the lesson the boy rested his head on his desk. He
passed away several chants in this manner. He reminded me of some high
school boys I taught who would sleep that way. He did, however raise a
hand several times when a guessing game was being played. Many of the
children wanted to be in charge of the English bag which contained a
large and small London double-decker bus and a large and small London
taxi. To be in charge they needed to guess which one the child in charge
of the bag was holding. To be able to guess they needed to be chosen by
Professor Jaffke. He did not chose the boy who rested, though I have no
idea whether that had any bearing on the matter. It was quite clear
though, where the control rested. Somehow the straining of children
raising their hands reminds me of military salutes. Each time there was
a chance the hands shot up again. I realised I was witnessing a stream
of miniature competitions, the prize of which was to be able to use
English to touch a toy and be able to make the others guess. Or as I
realise now, the prize was a momentary taste of authority, albeit under
that of the teacher. A miniature example of what Michael Albert terms
the coordinator class (with working class below and the capitalist class

If this suggests to you that watching the class left me feeling
uncomfortable then you would be right. The children did appear to be
learning and considering the time of day after a full schedule of
lessons most were very well engaged. But still I wonder, is this really
the right kind of education?


## To accept authority is to submit to domination, to subjugate oneself
to an individual, to a group, to an ideology, whether religious or
political; and this subjugation of oneself to authority is denial , not
only of intelligence but also of individual freedom. #

The site now has its summer look, but little else to report at present.
perhaps next time?

Now Is The Best Time To Be.... A Think Tank Article about happiness.

Single Letter Sentences - A reading game

Ocean Escape - Download the original version of Snow Escape.


"## To follow authority has many advantages if one thinks in terms of
personal motivation and gain; but education based on individual
advancement and profit can only build a social structure which is
competitive, antagonistic and ruthless. This is the kind of society in
which we have been brought up, and our animosity and confusion are

I know that on more than one occasion I've written that compulsory
education is an oxymoron. It certainly is possible to put children in a
room and have a teacher teach a subject and have the children learn
something, but to call this education is to liken battery farm chickens
to swallows and swifts.

I think that until there is choice education will be warped. This is
because any experience of learning is more than the subject it is the
whole situation. Children can learn while being controlled but what they
also learn is that teachers have the right to control. Children learn to
submit to authority and to accept authority. But unless children freely
enter the classroom by what legitimate right do teachers exercise
control? It is essentially unjust and while there is no justice there
can be no peace.

But how can children be given free choice, how will they know what
choices to make? How can they make choices when they lack experience?
How dare we take the risk, isn't that shirking our duties and
responsibilities as adults? Yet, How many problems of the world are
grounded in accepting false authority? I think each older generation
curses the younger by training them to be obedient. I cannot see how we
could be worse off if we all began really examining authority and
questioning its legitimacy.

Until adults learn to give children respect and trust we are doomed to
repeat the sorry mess we call civilization ad infinitum from one
generation to another, unless we mess it up completely with a total
collapse. Do we want the future to be so brutal?

The truth is that most children are quite capable of making choices,
often more so than grown ups. The ability is something that can be
practised and exercised. Children usually know what they want to do,
they know what they are interested in far more than adults who all to
often have had all passion for life squashed out of them.

The problem is that we adults like to judge and label. We want to
prescribe what children should do. This is the empty cup model of
education. Children should be filled with our own concoctions . Usually,
it is a stagnant, putrid brew.

This whole view of education is misanthropic. It also has entirely the
wrong focus. Rather than controlling what is put in the cup of learning
we should be helping children to create wonder, beautiful, magnificent
vessels. Vessels not merely for consumption but also for journeying
through life. We should allow children to experiment and fill their cups
as they like. Then perhaps they can also learn to see the relationship
between what is put in the cup and the quality of the cup itself.

I believe that every time we allow children to exercise choice we take a
step towards democracy and every time we control them arbitrarily we
take a step backwards. This realisation is something that has been
growing on me and truth be told is making my life increasingly
problematic. I have a job at a kindergarten where I am supposed to teach
English to children whether they want me to or not. The very basis of my
employment is undemocratic and is a daily practise in injustice. My
daily puzzle, my ongoing koan is to find a way to transform the
situation. I'll keep you posted, but I'd like you to consider the
relationship between free choice, democracy and justice.

We have created many authoritarian and competitive structures in the
world and consequently the world is horribly violent. We can resist the
assault that Arundhati Roy mentioned by refusing to be a part of it. We
can do this by learning to question authority, to resist it where
appropriate and to resist using it. We can do this as daily practise.
Each time we act on this notion we create a pinprick for democracy.
Enough pinpricks and we can slay the leviathan.

"## Conventional education makes independent thinking extremely
difficult. ##"


You can subscribe and unsubscribe from this Wise Hat News by visiting

To subscribe directly by email send an email to
wisehat-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and put “subscribe” in the Subject Line
(without the quotes)

To unsubscribe directly by email send an email to
wisehat-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and put “unsubscribe” in the Subject Line
(without the quotes).

Comments, questions, submissions and suggestions are welcome. Please
email Chris

"##. To regard education as a means of livelihood is to exploit the
children for one's own advantage. In an enlightened society , teachers
will have no concern for their own welfare, and the community will
provide for their needs. ##"

(## Quotes this issue from "Education And The Significance of Life" by
Krishnamurti )

Other related posts:

  • » [wisehat] Wise Hat News #12