[windows2000] Re: activity!!

  • From: "Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data" <bcoffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:18:20 -0500

I agree with you on Wizards, they suck.
 
Folder and file concepts really have nothing to do with Gates.  
 
I think you need a class.  There really isn't anything difficult about using
Windows 2000 for basic tasks, unless you are trying to force your 1989
concepts on a 1999 operating system in 2006.
 
What platform did you work on in 1989?
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard F. Strait
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:39 PM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: activity!!


VBG, I didn't really need all the bells and whistles that came with the
later version of Windows, plus my old 486 was supporting me fine, until I
could no longer use email, running out of processor room! Then through a
stroke of luck I came into posssession of a Compaq "Prosignia Desktop" with
Windows 2000 installed and a megabyte hard drive and sound system. It was
like being in seventh heaven. I'm retired and now I'm spending all my time
on the PC. When it comes to computers I don't consider myself a newbie, it
is just that I haven't kept up with the technology, but in hardware and
software! I'm extremely disappointed in the way software is designed today.
It is no longer intuitive and so complex one needs a road map to navigate.
Each software designer and programmer believes that their bread and butter
depends upon how fancy they can be, especially with the GUI. I also dislike
the WIZARD interfaces. Gates and companies folder and file concept sucks.  I
believe in the KISS principle!
 
Enough of my comments!
 
rfs
 
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:13:35 -0800 (PST) "Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com";
<jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

     \/  I went from a Z80 to Windows XP and whew what a shock....!  : p
@juno.com> wrote:
 
I can see from the Juno account that you are a serious newbie.  What can we
do to help? Really I would like to know how you got by all these years
without Windows 95, 98, 98 SE, WinME, Windows NT, and skipped right to 2000
which is now 6 years old and been replaced by XP. Where have you been for 15
years? Sounds sort of Rip van Winkleish.
 

Is this list active!

I upgraded recently from W3.1 to W2000 and miss some of the capabilities
of the old 3.1. For example I now have a screenful of icons on the
Desktop! I've been looking for ways to subgroup some of them so I don't
have to have them all showing! Gate's and company have not really
improved Windows, but merely making it more difficult to use.

A 1989 retired Computer Systems Analyst!

rfs
*****************************
New Site from The Kenzig Group!
Windows Vista Links, list options 
and info are available at:
http://www.VistaPop.com
***************************** 
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm





Jim Kenzig <mailto:web@xxxxxxxxxx>  
CEO The Kenzig Group
http://www.kenzig.com
Sponsorships  <http://www.kenzig.com/217/227/index.html> Available!
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Terminal Services Downloads: http://www.thinhelp.com
Windows Vista: http://www.VistaPop.com
Virtualization: http://www.virtualize-it.com
Games: http://www.stressedpuppy.com
 

Other related posts: