[windows2000] Re: Windows 7, why did it take so long?

  • From: Patrick <london31uk@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:39:32 -0800 (PST)

Hi Jim,

Funny enough, I am doing just that. Did have a problem getting it to join the 
domain (the domain can not be more that 15 char problem), but that was soon 
sorted out with a patch. All my drives mapped ok, and RDp works great. I have a 
few apps (Office 2007 plus ) installed, but  iguess it is still early days. 
However it still feels light. Might change my mind in 30days


From: Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx>
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 12:35:13 PM
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Windows 7, why did it take so long?

Wait til you put it on a network with roaming profiles and try and go between a 
few pc's and then tell me the same thing. 
Jim Kenzig 
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Patrick <london31uk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I used a hp dc7700 SFF and I am dual booting with 4GB or ram and 150GB hard 
disk split between both OS.

It really does feel like MS have got it right this time. Did not need any 
drivers loaded, started up straight after

From: Sorin Srbu <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:50:33 PM
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Windows 7, why did it take so long?

Really? It's that good?

What's your hardware?


>-----Original Message-----
>From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>On Behalf Of Patrick
>Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:27 PM
>To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [windows2000] Windows 7, why did it take so long?

>Hi Guys,
>Just loaded windows 7 on my pc, and what a real joy to have. It feels so
light, but yet
>so right. Did not have to install any drivers to getting it working. I think
MS will do well
>with this product. Inital Score 90%


Other related posts: