Non-routable is a bit incorrect. We have about 30 different customers, each with less than 254 hosts, using 192.168.101.x, 192.168.102.x, etc, and each network is connected and routed to each other. Generally, routers that are on the internet, are not programed to route this range of address, but it can be and is done very often in the workplace. We actually are using RIP v2, and it works spledidly with both 10.x.x.x and 192.168.x.x. There are 3 classes of IP addresses reserved for "internal use": Class A 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 (10/8 prefix) Class B 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 (172.16/12 prefix) Class C 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix) These are specified in RFC 1918 "Address Allocation for Private Internets". http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc1918.html Hope that helps, Tom Erdely http://erdely.no -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] P=E5 vegne av Rick Fogarty Sendt: 18. november 2002 15:39 Til: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Emne: [windows2000] Re: 192.168.*.* - why? Ray, I believe it's a predefined - non routable number designed for just this purpose - internal networks. Similar to the 10.0.x.x series I think. No? Rick -----Original Message----- From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Costanzo, Ray Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 8:59 AM To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [windows2000] 192.168.*.* - why? Hi list, I'm just curious about something. It seems that most networks use 192.168.*.* for their internal addresses. Why? It doesn't really matter, does it? Isn't 192.168.*.* completely arbitrary? My theory on how this came to be the norm is that MS used those addresses in some samples in some books or something, and people started using that and it just became the norm. But then there's that whole Internet connection sharing feature that came out in what, W98SE? With that, the computer that's sharing its Internet connection will be 192.168.1.1. So, I imagine that it's coded somewhere into other OS'es to look to see if 192.168.1.1 can be used as a gateway when the user does not specify an IP configuration. So what came first? 192.168.*.* or computers looking to 192.168.1.1 as a gateway? Or what my real question is is why 192.168.*.*? Thanks, Ray at work ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com ********************************************************************** =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm ================================== To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm