[windows2000] Re: OT: SATA Hard Drives
- From: "Charles R. Buchanan" <daphatbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 19:52:59 -0800
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 09:10:50 +0100, "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> took
time to say the following:
SS> windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <> wrote on :
SS>
SS> I don't have a problem booting fast enough on my oldie PATA-drives. 8-) If
SS> that's an issue for you, then install the os on the raided SATA-drives. It's
SS> all about how you things setup. Me for instance prefer stability and just
SS> plainly hate to reinstall the os and all the apps, should the raid array
SS> break. It's not the actual work that bothers me, it's the time it takes to
SS> setup eveything again. But that's just me. 8-)
That's probably the biggest possible setback, but while I don't
re-install as much as I use to, it's not a HUGE problem. Sometimes it's
good to start off with a clean slate. :-)
SS> YMMV as they say. 8-)
Yep!
SS> Out of curiosity, how much faster do you boot on the SATA-drives compared to
SS> the PATA-drives? Are talking minutes or tens of seconds/seconds?
I would say it's faster by a minute or two. Never thought of timing it,
but it was a noticable difference.
For what is a man, what has he got?
If not himself, then he has naught
To say the things he truly feels and not the words of one who kneels
*****************************
New Site from The Kenzig Group!
Windows Vista Links, list options
and info are available at:
http://www.VistaPop.com
*****************************
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
