[windows2000] Re: OT- PC Naming Conventions

  • From: Daniel Ensor <densor@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:44:02 +0100

-----Original Message-----
From: Sorin Srbu [mailto:Sorin.Srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:36 PM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: OT- PC Naming Conventions


On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:56:53 +0100, Daniel Ensor wrote:

>Excellent strategy, I'm boring and use location, os and user combined.
>
>I am going to now start naming them all after Yoda and chums,

Being sarcastic are we? ;-)

However in really big environments, you might want to reconsider
naming after yoda and chaps. Your strategy with location, os and
user might be more appropriate then.

But so dull....

>Cheers
>Dan
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sorin Srbu [mailto:Sorin.Srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:50 AM
>To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [windows2000] Re: OT- PC Naming Conventions
>
>
>I name our dept computers after some theme or another, ie what
>feels best for the moment. For a time I named them after various
>star trek-themes, like Klingon, Defiant etc. Some time it was Star
>Wars, like Luke, Vader etc. Also star-configurations has been used
>like Orion, Libra etc.
>
>One good thing not naming them with numbers like below, is that you
>get a reasonably good hunch of what computer I'm dealing with
>(location and user). We have some 60-70 clients out now, and I have
>not seen any problem.
>
>Also the users like that the computers are named after things, so
>that their computers aquire some kind of soul. Ppl ten to care more
>about the computer if it has a name, as opposed to "computer123a"
>or some such. If the computer has a machinelike name the users tend
>to slap it around more. 
>
>Must be a subconscious psychological thing or something. 8-)
>
>--Original Message Text---
>From: Farrugia, Paul
>Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:10:44 -0400
>
>Hello,  
>
>We are looking to change the naming conventions that we use for
>PCs. Right now we name them with the department name and a number
>(ex: for our Accounting Dept- acct4, acct5, etc.).  It was
>recommended to us that we should change our naming convention for
>security reasons. I wanted to know what convention others are
>using&.  



BW,

Sorin

# Sorin Srbu, Systems Engineer          Web:
http://www.farmfak.uu.se/organisk/
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry,          Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 >> 5
signals >> GSM
# Div of Org Pharm Chem,                        Mobile Phone: +46
(0)701-718023
# BMC, Box 574, Uppsala University      Fax: +46 (0)18-4714474
# SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden             Visit: BMC, Husargatan 3, D5:512b
#
# Public PGP key available on request.
#
# ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
# /\


********************************************************
This Week's Sponsor - RTO Software / TScale
What's keeping you from getting more from your terminal servers? Did you
know, in most cases, CPU Utilization IS NOT the single biggest constraint to
scaling up?! Get this free white paper to understand the real constraints &
how to overcome them. SAVE MONEY by scaling-up rather than buying more
servers.
http://www.rtosoft.com/Enter.asp?ID=147
**********************************************************
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

Visit the new FDL web - site designed to serve you better -
http://www.fdl.co.uk 


This message has been sent from Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd and confirms that the
email has been scanned and to the best of our knowledge is free from virus
infection. The unauthorised use, disclosure, forwarding or copying of this
message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this message in error, please email moderator@xxxxxxxxx This message and any
attachments, which are confidential and may be privileged, are for the use
of the addressee(s) only. The views and opinions expressed in this email
message are the author's own and may not reflect the views and opinions of
Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. 
********************************************************
This Week's Sponsor - RTO Software / TScale
What's keeping you from getting more from your terminal servers? Did you know, 
in most cases, CPU Utilization IS NOT the single biggest constraint to scaling 
up?! Get this free white paper to understand the real constraints & how to 
overcome them. SAVE MONEY by scaling-up rather than buying more servers.
http://www.rtosoft.com/Enter.asp?ID=147
**********************************************************
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

Other related posts: