[windows2000] Re: .NET 2003 vs Windows2000 (servers)
- From: "Charles R. Buchanan" <crbgfblab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 08:55:25 -0800
I thought that M$ would have more updates than I have found so far. Probably
not a big concern now since it is still a RC. <shrug>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Robert Funderburk
>Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 9:49 PM
>To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [windows2000] Re: .NET 2003 vs Windows2000 (servers)
>
>
>
>I have found .NET RC2 to be super stable, but then again, so is 2K
>server. I haven't loaded any strange apps on it yet.
---
Ohio State Buckeyes - National Champions!
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.435 / Virus Database: 244 - Release Date: 12/30/2002
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
- References:
- [windows2000] Re: .NET 2003 vs Windows2000 (servers)
- From: Robert Funderburk
Other related posts:
- » [windows2000] .NET 2003 vs Windows2000 (servers)
- » [windows2000] Re: .NET 2003 vs Windows2000 (servers)
- » [windows2000] Re: .NET 2003 vs Windows2000 (servers)
- [windows2000] Re: .NET 2003 vs Windows2000 (servers)
- From: Robert Funderburk