[windows2000] Re: Can't DCs be ghosted??

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 07:09:17 -0800, Joe Shonk wrote:

>I agree cost will eventually be an issue...  Perhaps this will push =
>manufacture into eventually merging the two technologies together (with =
>different levels of performance),  drive down the cost of SCSI =
>peripherals, drives, etc.  and/or simply push the ATA technology into =
>higher-end systems.

What do the "experts" say about scsi vs serial-ata? Will serial-ata
smash scsi into oblivion?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sorin Srbu [mailto:sorin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:34 AM
>To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [windows2000] Re: Can't DCs be ghosted??
>
>
>
>On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:41:24 -0800, Joe Shonk wrote:
>
>>Don't get me wrong... I like AMD... My home PC is running an Athlon =3D
>>processor... But using an AMD processor in a server is like using =3D
>>ATA/UMDA Drives instead of Ultra160 drives.
>
>I'm actually trying out ATA/UDMA on a secondary (non-critical)
>server. It has run for about a year now, without problems. Well,
>except for the primary hd crashing fatally after a week after
>building the server. I shouldn't have used an old drive in the
>first place. But, being on a small budget... WHat can you do...


BW,

Sorin

# Sorin Srbu, Systems Engineer          Web: http://www.farmaci.uu.se
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry,          Phone: +46-18-4714482 >> 5 signals >> 
GSM
# Div of Org Pharm Chem,                        Mobile Phone: +46-701-718023
# BMC, Box 574, Uppsala University      Fax: +46-18-471-4474
# SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden             Visit: BMC, Husargatan 3, D5:512b
#
# Public PGP key available on request.



==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

Other related posts: