[windows2000] Re: 192.168.*.* - why?

  • From: Robert Funderburk <robfunderburk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:48:19 -0500

They are routable


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "buzzzyy" <list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:08 AM
Subject: [windows2000] Re: 192.168.*.* - why?


> 
> Just some old RFC standard. One of few nonroutable blocks set aside for
> internal addresses. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Costanzo, Ray
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 8:59 AM
> To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [windows2000] 192.168.*.* - why?
> 
> 
> 
> Hi list,
> 
> I'm just curious about something.  It seems that most networks use
> 192.168.*.* for their internal addresses.  Why?  It doesn't really
> matter, does it?  Isn't 192.168.*.* completely arbitrary?  My theory on
> how this came to be the norm is that MS used those addresses in some
> samples in some books or something, and people started using that and it
> just became the norm.  But then there's that whole Internet connection
> sharing feature that came out in what, W98SE?  With that, the computer
> that's sharing its Internet connection will be 192.168.1.1.  So, I
> imagine that it's coded somewhere into other OS'es to look to see if
> 192.168.1.1 can be used as a gateway when the user does not specify an
> IP configuration.  So what came first?  192.168.*.* or computers looking
> to 192.168.1.1 as a gateway?  Or what my real question is is why
> 192.168.*.*?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ray at work
> 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
> system manager.
> 
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> 
> www.mimesweeper.com
> **********************************************************************
> 
> 
> ==================================
> To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
> mode or view archives use the below link.
> 
> http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
> 
> 
> ==================================
> To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
> mode or view archives use the below link.
> 
> http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

Other related posts: