If you are asking whether the extra half-meg of cache memory will make a difference, the answer is a definite maybe. SQL server or Exchange server, maybe. File server, not really. Depends on what the machine has to do... But all in all, it's not worth the money. Reference: http://tinyurl.com/2bnb4 HTH, Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA David Clark Company Inc. -----Original Message----- From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ray at work Posted At: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 10:27 AM Posted To: Windows 2000 Conversation: [windows2000] 1 MB cache vs. 512 KB Subject: [windows2000] 1 MB cache vs. 512 KB Can anyone tell me if this statement is true? This in reference to a new server with some Xeon processors. ________________________________ From: Some Vendor Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:22 AM To: Costanzo, Ray Subject: FW: Need Pricing I forgot to list that this is the 3.06GHz with 1MB cache processor version. There is also a 512k cache model, but for $ 100 more the 1Mb is much faster. ------------------------------ Thank you, Ray at work ******************************************************** This Weeks Sponsor StressedPuppy.com Games Feeling stressed out? Check out our games to relieve your stress. http://www.StressedPuppy.com ******************************************************** To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm ******************************************************** This Weeks Sponsor StressedPuppy.com Games Feeling stressed out? Check out our games to relieve your stress. http://www.StressedPuppy.com ******************************************************** To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm