> > 3. Syntax highlighting. I'd be curious to hear what others > > think on the subject. I am surprised how much I miss it when > > I've got a chapter with 200 small footnotes. > > I used to be very fond of syntax highlighting, then one day I > found myself allergic to it. Now I can't stand it. But then, I > mostly work with C source code.... I can see how it would be > useful for text markup :) I am currently writing a 200+ page thesis in Latex using wily; it's not hard to navigate if you are strict with yourself, using multiple files and a strict indentation policy. It's a bit like writing C.... If you use indentation and blank lines carefully, then the whole thing can ||fmt (or fw to match the tab size) without messing up. As for footnotes, I find them very hard to read in latex src; I think that syntax highlighting would help, but probably not much. Eg. (excuse the narrow text width---so that the mail client doesn't change it, the tab stop should be 4 chars for anyone not using wily to read mail.). \section{Editors} The previous section showed how an editor is a necessary tool for markup. Here we describe some features that are frequently used. \subsection{Cut and Paste} The menu oriented nature of \emph{cut and paste} in most editors is not useful.\begin{equation} E=mc^2 \end{equation} \subsection{Multiple Concurrent Files} dvorjak \section{Beer} Beer should be used daily after using Latex in order to preserve sanity. i