[webproducers] Re: software for printing websites


This is true but mainly for fonts since it will replace whatever's on the
screen with a high resolution eqivalent.

Layout is always preserved while image quality will vary depending on your
compression settings.

The main advantage of using Acrobat is that it creates an editable,
compressed, printable, and electronically distributable archive of a web
site.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Set in our way, content with our decay, we wave the flag of freedom as
 we conquer and invade..."

                         -- Operation Ivy (Freeze Up)

On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, cccook wrote:

> 
> I've worked with Acrobat, but I've found that it does not always 
> accurately represent the way the pages appear on screen.
> 
> >yes, it's called Adobe Acrobat.
> >
> >Acrobat v4 and above includes a web capture feature that will d/l all
> >pages - even the dynamically generated ones and compress them to boot.
> >
> >it's not exactly a speed demon but will do the trick.
> >
> >NOTE: the Mac version supports this feature too but on version 4, it must
> >be d/l from adobe's site.
> __________________________________________________________________________
> Check out www.webproducers.org to easily access list commands like subscribe, 
> unsubscribe, digest mode, vacation, and to read the list archive.
> 
> Questions and comments are welcome just e-mail me, morry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

__________________________________________________________________________
Check out www.webproducers.org to easily access list commands like subscribe, 
unsubscribe, digest mode, vacation, and to read the list archive.

Questions and comments are welcome just e-mail me, morry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: