[webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- From: Amy Hung <emiyaone@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: webproducers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:43:02 -0800 (PST)
hi darren,
i think you emailed to the wrong amy. i didn't do the
site you are talking about.
--- Darren Ernest <Darren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Amy,
>
> I realize that this was posted a while back, but I
> haven't checked my
> [webproducers] emails in a long time.
>
> Anyway, here are some comments (mostly based on the
> homepage):
>
> 1) Homepage Message
> As a marketing communications specialist the first
> thing I do is examine
> where my eye goes and what the first message I get
> is -- in this case, there
> are NO messages on the homepage -- not even a tag
> line, a mission statement,
> or a description of JTS. You may assume that your
> audience knows who or
> what you're all about, but they may not -- and even
> if they do, some type of
> marketing message will make a lasting and positive
> impression. For example,
> an east coast ski resort in might say, The best
> skiing in the North East. A
> spa might say, "The ultimate in relaxation and
> pampering." When coming up
> with a tag line, use your mission statement, which
> should be written with
> the audience benefit in mind. For example, a
> manufacturer that makes hockey
> sticks might have a mission statement that reads,
> "To manufacture the
> highest quality hockey sticks," but their mission
> statement should be "To
> enable superior athletic performance by
> manufacturing superior quality
> products" or some such variation. Translated into a
> great homepage tag
> line: Enabling superior athletic performance with
> superior quality products.
>
> 2) Changing Homepage
> It is winter right now -- seeing a spring/summer
> picture of your building
> looks funny to me. In winter, I'd like to see a
> picture of the building
> with snow maybe. Perhaps even you should have
> several pictures of the
> campus and each loads randomly each time the
> homepage is accessed. You
> could have the same image in different seasons, as
> well as show off your
> library, hallways, lecture halls, etc. Here's
> another tip from the print
> world: when you use photographs, it is always a good
> idea to have
> accompanying text that tells the reader something
> about the image. Images
> attract attention, and when there is no message, the
> attention is wasted.
> Why is the image there -- to say we have a beautiful
> campus, or look at the
> great courtyard you can hang out in? Whatever the
> reason, associate some
> marketing message with the image. You have included
> text, but the message
> could have greater impact to achieve your goals.
>
> 3) Browser compatibility
> Congratulations - many sites do not render properly
> in Mozilla. The type of
> navigation used is often rendered incorrectly, among
> other problems. It is
> good that you made your site browser compatible.
>
> 4) Meta Tags
> I found no keywords or description tags, nor any of
> the other search engine
> specific tags. Perhaps search engine visibility was
> not part of your site
> goals/objectives. What is the goal of the site?
> One is to attract eligible
> students, but are there secondary goals such as
> public awareness and
> education? Do you want search engine traffic? If
> so, you this site can be
> better optimized, although that is a much longer
> discussion, and requires a
> page by page analysis along with a communicated
> understanding of each
> individual page's goal.
>
> 5) User Experience
> When clicking through the site, I am unsure why the
> quick links and search
> were dropped to the bottom of the page. There is
> still available "real
> estate" on the top, and this kind of change may
> confuse some.
>
> 6) Page Resizing
> Resizing the page to fill the browser is a neat
> thing you can do on the web,
> and I encourage it from an esthetic point of view.
> But, from a user point
> of view, I strongly suggest setting maximum
> parameters for content. Ideal
> column widths are between 8-12 words -- anything
> more than 12 is just too
> hard to read, and users are likely to glance at the
> page looking for a small
> "sound bite" they can easily digest. If all they
> see are long long lines of
> text (I counted 20 words in many lines on
> http://www.jtsa.edu/development/index.shtml) they
> will simply click to the
> next page. Check your site logs and see what the
> average amount of time
> spent on each page was -- was it long enough for the
> average reader to
> absorb the key messages of the page? Of course,
> there are other strategies
> which must also be incorporated to get more visitors
> to actually read
> content, but column width really stands out and is
> easy enough to fix.
>
> 7) Breadcrumbs
> It took me a while to figure out why it said JTS /
> something on all the
> pages. I was confused, and thought it was giving me
> the option of going to
> other pages. Even Jakob Nielson has trouble with
> this on his site, using a
> colon for his breadcrumb pattern. His site has no
> graphics so it loads
> quickly, but he had to give in, and use an arrow
> graphic in order to show
> users that the there was a hierarchy at play. That
> is why many use this:
> one > two > three. That is a better way to show
> path than the forward
> slash. Plus, most sites that do this effectively do
> it in a special
> space -- yours is floating in the middle of no
> where. I recommend you
> discuss this with your designer, and find a better
> way to designate the
> bread crumb. Do you really require it even? It is
> mostly used on sites
> with more than 3 levels of content. Perhaps place
> is in the same place you
> have the << back link on the contact page.
>
> Overall, I think the layout, and color scheme are
> attractive and modern.
> Clearly, you have also spent a considerable amount
> of time on the
> information architecture, which is very important.
> I wish you lots of luck
> with your new site and hope the
> redesign/implementation meets the objectives
> that warranted a new site in the first place. I
> hope my comments are useful
> to you. Please feel free to contact me if you have
> any questions.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> ~Darren
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "A.Helfman" <amhelfman@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <webproducers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:36 AM
> Subject: [webproducers] New website
>
>
> >
> > The Jewish Theological Seminary recently
> launched a completely
> > redesigned and restructured website. Please visit
> us at www.jtsa.edu.
> > Comments welcome.
> >
> >
> > Amy W. Helfman
> > Manager of Web Technologies
> > Computer Operations, Jewish Theological Seminary
> >
> > Voice: (212) 678-8043 Fax: (212)
> 678-8891
> > Email: amhelfman@xxxxxxxx Website:
> www.jtsa.edu
> >
> >
>
__________________________________________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe send a blank message with
> unsubscribe in the subject to
> webproducers-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
__________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe send a blank message with unsubscribe in the subject to
webproducers-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To access our webform to subscribe, unsubscribe, and manage your subscription
(digest and vacation) visit www.WebProducers.org.
The WPO list is a public discussion forum with a public archive at
www.WebProducers.org. Be sure to trim your posts and delete personal
information such as telephone numbers if you do not want them as part of the
archive.
Other related posts:
- » [webproducers] my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website
- » [webproducers] Re: my feedback, was New website