[wdmaudiodev] Re: Windows 7 wave cyclic driver

  • From: "Matthew van Eerde" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Matthew.van.Eerde" for DMARC)
  • To: "wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:59:40 +0000

What WAVEFORMATEX is being passed to your NewStream implementation, and what 
WAVEFORMATEX is in the “fmt ” chunk of the captured .wav file?



From: Farrah Avanesov<mailto:favanesov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 11:53 AM
To: wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: timr@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:timr@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [wdmaudiodev] Re: Windows 7 wave cyclic driver



On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 18:29 +0000, Matthew van Eerde wrote:

The advantage of using a sine wave (as opposed to a sentinel value
like 0xdeadbeef) is that sine waves tend to be resilient to audio
processing (changing from int to float, dynamic range compression
etc.) but sentinel values are very fragile

I used the following sine wave:

0x8000,0xda82,0xffff,0xda82,0x8000,0x257d,0x0,0x257d

but the captured wav file has a series of 4 to 5 0x0080 followed by
0xff7f, 0x0080, 0xff7f, and repeats.



----------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential to 
Ross Video.

If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately by replying 
to this message. Please also delete all copies. Thank you.
******************

WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe:    mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
Unsubscribe:  mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Moderator:    mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/

Other related posts: