[wdmaudiodev] Re: Mixer API under Vista build 5308
- From: "Frank Yerrace" <Frank.Yerrace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:13:41 -0800
We very much appreciate that this community is taking a good look at
Vista and giving specific feedback like this. Thank you.
Please give us a couple weeks to study this issue here to see if we can
offer some alternatives for certain classes of applications like this.
If you hear nothing more within that timeframe, please raise the issue
again.
Frank Yerrace
Technical Lead
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
-----Original Message-----
From: wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wdmaudiodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of stephen turner
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 9:26 AM
To: wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wdmaudiodev] Re: Mixer API under Vista build 5308
I agree with Jeff and Dan -It looks like this is going to be a huge
problem for professional applications that still use the mixer API and
expect full control over the h/w. Is there a way that the audio
subsystem can be put in a "legacy" mode to make it act like 2000/XP?
-steve
----------------------
Stephen Turner
AudioScience, Inc.
-------- Original Message --------
> From: "Daniel E. Germann" <deg@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:13 AM
> To: wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [wdmaudiodev] Re: Mixer API under Vista build 5308
>
> We have customers that will have the same problem. Some are
broadcast, like
> Jeff's, and others use our products for test and measurement
applications.
> Both sets of customers have existing software that expects to access
the
> hardware through the mixer APIs. In fact, access to the main audio
fader is
> mandatory for the test and measurement app, so they can ensure their
test
> stimulus signal is not attenuated. Otherwise, it will look to their
> software like the response signal has a drop in level.
>
> Is there a white paper that talks about these changes that we could
pass on
> to our customers, so they have a "heads up"? Most of the public info
I've
> seen so far is in the HD Audio or driver realm.
>
> Thanks,
> -Dan
> --
> Dan Germann
> Digital Audio Labs
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Pages" <barefeet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 8:31 AM
> > Subject: [wdmaudiodev] Re: Mixer API under Vista build 5308
> >
> >
> > Thanks Frank. The controls are showing up correctly and are
functional
> > under Device Properties as you described.
> >
> > My main concern is that our products are targeted at the
professional
> > audio market, and many of our customers will be using our cards with
> > broadcast automation and mixing desk software that expects to find
these
> > controls through the mixer API, and the loss of this functionality
will
> > seriously impact on our business.
> >
> > Jeff
>
> ******************
>
> WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
> Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subscribe:
mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
> Unsubscribe:
mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
> http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
******************
WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
Unsubscribe:
mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
******************
WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
Other related posts:
