I am trying to understand the numbering (indexing) scheme of topology pins and I was looking at the MSVAD Simple sample to try to correlate this with what I understood (or didn't understand) so far. In mintopo.cpp there is an ASCII diagram that describes the topology for the Simple driver: (you need to view this in monospaced font) /********************************************************************* * Topology/Wave bridge connection * * * * +------+ +------+ * * | Wave | | Topo | * * | | | | * * Capture <---|0 1|<===|4 1|<--- Synth * * | | | | * * Render --->|2 3|===>|0 | * * +------+ | | * * | 2|<--- Mic * * | | * * | 3|---> Line Out * * +------+ * *********************************************************************/ In case the above couldn't display properly I will summarize here the pin numbers according to the diagram (notice, the start from 0): 0. Capture 1. Render 2. Synth 3. Mic 4. Line Out However, in simple.h the topology pin seem to be numbered differently: // topology pins. enum { KSPIN_TOPO_WAVEOUT_SOURCE = 0, KSPIN_TOPO_SYNTHOUT_SOURCE, KSPIN_TOPO_SYNTHIN_SOURCE, KSPIN_TOPO_MIC_SOURCE, KSPIN_TOPO_LINEOUT_DEST, KSPIN_TOPO_WAVEIN_DEST }; Not only they are numbered differently, there are 6 pins vs. only 5 in the diagram. What is the source of the discrepancy here? What am I missing? Is it possible that the above enum is not really being used in the Simple sample? If so, how come KSPIN_TOPO_SYNTHOUT_SOURCE, for example, is being used in PCCONNECTION_DESCRIPTOR MiniportConnections[] in toptable.h? Thanks for any tip that could clarify my confusion. Don ****************** WDMAUDIODEV addresses: Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx URL to WDMAUDIODEV page: http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/