[wdmaudiodev] Re: Audio devices for terminal servers.
- From: Dennis Scott <dennis.scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:10:35 +0530
Tim Roberts wrote:
>>"we didn't
>>know this was available when we started our design work, so we didn't
>>plan to use it, and now we're going to plow forward with our own plan
>>whether or not something better is available."
I AM AW AWARE OF VISTA RDP. we have not chosen rdp audio because MY CLIENT
DON'T WANED IT (and i cant ask my client the reason).
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Tim Roberts <timr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dennis Scott wrote:
> > My server is a customized application, due to some reasons i cant use
> > built in RDP sound sorry ;)
>
> I'm now going to climb on my soapbox.
>
> "Due to some reasons"? What that really says to me is that "we didn't
> know this was available when we started our design work, so we didn't
> plan to use it, and now we're going to plow forward with our own plan
> whether or not something better is available."
>
> The RIGHT thing to do is to step back for a few days and figure out how
> you can take advantage of what RDP can already do. It is utterly
> foolish to waste time re-inventing something that already works, instead
> of adapting what you have to use the existing tool.
>
> End of soapbox.
>
> --
> Tim Roberts, timr@xxxxxxxxx
> Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
>
> ******************
>
> WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
> Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
> Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
> http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
>
>
Other related posts:
