Dear All, Just to clarify, what I mean is certificate programs or certification preparation programs at the university setting. Thanks. Garett Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: gholm@xxxxxxxxxx Sender: visionrehabtherapist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:23:39 To: <deannaaustin2009@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <alee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <mmoscato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <visionrehabtherapist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: gholm@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: [visionrehabtherapist] Re: AER natinal convention Dear Deanna and all, Good evening. I too have heard the same. Another possibility is certification programs at the university setting. I have heard that there is such a program at Salus, but have yet to confirm this. There are similar programs for O&M at a few universities and ACVREP recognizes this through Category 2 eligibility requirements (O&M). This is perhaps another means to increase program capacity, as such programs are attractive to individuals considering career change. Thanks for the discussion and please keep the comments flowing. Respectfully, Garett A. Holm, President ACVREP Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: "deanna austin" <deannaaustin2009@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sender: visionrehabtherapist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:13:29 To: <gholm@xxxxxxxxxx>; <alee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <mmoscato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <visionrehabtherapist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: deannaaustin2009@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [visionrehabtherapist] Re: AER natinal convention Good evening all, Thanks so much Garett for your quick response to the below messages. As a comment, according to what I have heard, university programs are not at capacity. Just another reason why we need to continue to get the word out about VRT's. Deanna Austin Chair, VRT division From: gholm@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gholm@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 8:57 PM To: alee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mmoscato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; deannaaustin2009@xxxxxxxxxxx; visionrehabtherapist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [visionrehabtherapist] Re: AER natinal convention Dear Ali and All, Good evening. Thank you or your comments. Respectfully, Garett Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry _____ From: "Ali Lee" <alee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sender: visionrehabtherapist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:20:19 -0700 To: <gholm@xxxxxxxxxx>; <mmoscato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <deannaaustin2009@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <visionrehabtherapist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ReplyTo: alee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [visionrehabtherapist] Re: AER natinal convention Dear Garrett & All, Ah, yes. If VRTs are to be eventually reimbursed for services by Medicare and if referrals to vision rehabilitation is to be accepted practice by the medical community, then the new ACVREP certification standards make sense. The increase in certification standards match the ACVREP mission as listed on the website at http://www.acvrep.org/: "Advancing professional competency in vision rehabilitation and education to promote service quality." We are, indeed, at a critical time when quantity of VRTS also matters so the people who require the services will receive them. Yet, in the long-term, this profession needs to continue to gain legitimacy which may, in turn, translate into funding and increase the likelihood of universities re-establishing VRT training programs like Florida State University, my alma mater. Ali Ali Lee , CVRT Vision Loss Services Coordinator LightHouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired LightHouse of the North Coast, Satellite Program 1910 California Street, Third Floor Eureka, CA 95501 (707) 268-5646 (707) 268-5655 TTY (707) 268-5647 FAX alee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.lighthouse-sf.org http://www.lighthouse-sf.org/events/2010/ehc-60th.php Enchanted Hills Camp: 60 Summers of Community and connection _____ From: visionrehabtherapist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Garrett Holm Sent: Tue 07/27/10 1:48 PM To: mmoscato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; deannaaustin2009@xxxxxxxxxxx; visionrehabtherapist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [visionrehabtherapist] Re: AER natinal convention Dear Maureen and All, Good morning. I hope this finds you all well. To provide some clarity on the matter the changes to eligibility criteria (formerly Category 3; now Category 2, scheduled to be terminated on August 31, 2010) only pertains to those individuals who are seeking initial ACVREP certification. For those with who already hold ACVREP certification, recertification requirements remain the same. Therefore, Maureen and others in her situation are not affected by the change. I was fortunate enough to address this issue at the AER International Conference during the VRT Division Meeting. The biggest issue relative to this matter is that this change leaves only one pathway (Category 1) to apply for ACVREP Certification for Vision Rehabilitation Therapy. It is import to be clear in the fact that this single pathway is degree bound. Given this new provision and other conditions facing the field, I asked the individuals present if this change would yield good our bad consequences on the field as a whole. For those not able to attend, I would like to extend the same opportunity. Please express any concerns or positive consequences resulting from this action. I will be happy to share these comments with the ACVREP Board and the CVRT Subject Matter Committee, which will be implemented shortly. Thank you. Garett A. Holm, President ACVREP