Hi Tony, I'm using version 11, the latest. I haven't gone into all of its features much, so i can't really comment accessibilitywise as between version 10 and version 11. Version 9 may be a little 'old' by now. The reason I upgraded was due to the 'nag screen'. Then, when i did a system Restore for some reason shortly afterwards, I had other file problems (which may or may not have had to do with WMP. Then restored version 11, and whatever else, and the problems went away.) Version 10 may be a little more straightforward in CD burning. However, I have got used to using the tab key in the 'play area', to move from one control to another, whether that be there or in any of the other areas such as the library, graphics equalizer, etc. There is now a JAWS tutorial on Windows media player 11. So, if you're using thversion 11 - the latest - I could pass the url on to you. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Sweeney" <tonysweeney1@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:03 PM Subject: [vicsireland] Re: Windows Media Player Hi Flor Again! Thanks for all that interesting info! Could you let me know what version of WMP you use then and how do you find it accessibility wise compared to other versions of WMP, say 9 or 10 for example? Tony. ----- Original Message ----- >From: "Flor Lynch" <florlync@xxxxxx> To: <vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 2:16 AM Subject: [vicsireland] Re: Accessible Windows Media Player > Hi Tony, > > It seems to depend on what you want to actually do with the player. From a > straightforward, no-strings-attached, point of view, Winamp, despite its > rather unorthodox structures, is the most accessible player of the Big > Three - WMP, RealPlayer, and Winamp. (there are limitations, however, when > it comes to CD writing/burning in the free version of Winamp, that do not > seem to apply to either WMP or RealPlayer.) (Subject to amendment, as i > have not used players other than Windows Media for these purposes.) > > Also, consider trialling VUPlayer! I don't have a Web site for it. another > player you might consider trialling - same lack of knowledge applies! - is > Foobar 2000. later versions of winamp are, or tend to work less well - or > be more 'buggy' - than their predecessors. (Now, you want to bring on the > Clare team? Good luck with all that!) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Sweeney" <tonysweeney1@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "vics" <vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:51 AM > Subject: [vicsireland] Accessible Windows Media Player > > > Hi All, > For a project that I'm involved in, could some one please let me know what > is, in your opinion, the best Windows Media Player for downloading? > > There is a 11 version but I hear that 9 or 10 might be better > accessibility-wise! > > > Thanks. > > Tony. > > > >