[va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- From: Tom Gray <tomgray@xxxxxxx>
- To: va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 18:04:16 -0500
At 09:19 AM 12/27/2003 -0500, Christian Kessler wrote:
>don't know the answer to your very good question, but do know that
>cell-phone & radio towers are also hard on birds. understand that a big
>part of the issue there is the strobe lights to warn low-flying
>aircraft. the birds apparently fly into the lights. but more
>information would be nice. also noted that the previous report
>indicated 44,000 birds over 20 years, which is 2,200 birds a year -- but
>what does that mean in context? I have no real idea. jck
My personal opinion is that the overall number, while it is always
appalling to think of numbers of birds dying, is not very significant.
I say this because the number of birds killed every year by many other
human-related sources is huge in comparison:
House cats: ~1 billion
Buildings: 100 million to 1 billion
Autos: 60 million to 80 million
Power lines: hundreds of thousands to 174 million
Pesticides: 67 million
(These are annual totals for the U.S. only.)
As one of my previous postings indicated, what DOES seem like a
legitimate concern is the composition of birds killed in Altamont Pass
--particularly golden eagles (protected under the federal Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act) and burrowing owls (a declining species).
I believe that while wind plants may present a threat to specific species
at specific sites, they are not a significant threat to birds-in-general.
I hope that answers your question about context--if it doesn't, ask
again and I'll try again.
Regards,
Tom Gray
American Wind Energy Association
You are subscribed to VA-BIRD. To post to this mailing list, simply send email
to va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to
va-bird-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field.
- References:
- [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- From: LeighTern
- [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- From: Christian Kessler
Other related posts:
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- » [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- From: LeighTern
- [va-bird] Re: windpower Post article
- From: Christian Kessler