[va-bird] Name The Peeps Results
- From: Paul Kane <pmkane@xxxxxxx>
- To: VA Birds <va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:02:44 -0400
All,
Twenty-five mostly veteran birders took a crack at my "Name The
Peeps" inquiry. Thanx much for chipping in.
The news is mixed. On the plus side, no one voted for Purple
Sandpiper, so the money you all spent on your optics and field guides
has not been entirely wasted. Not yet anyway.
On the other hand: one veteran birder I know very well voted for
"none of the above, either because of the poor quality of the
digiscope or because he started drinking way to early today. There
wasn't anything wrong with the digiscope.
The early voting was overwhelmingly for Juv Western Sandpiper, which
ultimately received 10 votes.
Later in the day, respondents were voting overwhelmingly for
Semipalmated Sandpiper. Of the 13 votes ultimately cast for
Semipalmated, 11 of these were for Juv Semiplamated. 1 vote for
Semipalmated in basic plumage was received, and 1 vote for
semipalmated transitioning from breeding to basic plumage was cast.
A veteran birder voting for Juv Western responded this way today:
"Considering the crisp feather edging, the upper scapulars darker
than the lower, and the bill thicker at the base than the tip,
probably D."
A veteran birder voting for Juv Semipalmated responded this way
today: "To me, your birds (especially the one in the middle) look
just like Sibley's painting of juvenile Semipalmated Sandpiper. To
me, the bill is too short and stout for most Western Sandpipers. Yes,
the shoulders look rusty, but I think they are within range of
variation for juvenile Semipal."
Paul Kane
Falls Church, VA
You are subscribed to VA-BIRD. To post to this mailing list, simply send email
to va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to
va-bird-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field.
Other related posts: