[va-bird] Re: Ivory Billed
- From: "WILLIAM and THERESE Leigh" <leightern@xxxxxxx>
- To: russlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 16:17:12 +0000
We just need to clone these LordGod birds Jurassic Park style. Install them in a various wildlife refuges across the deep south and thus create a environmental renaissance of epic proportions. Can you click a clone?
W
William Leigh
Bridgewater VA
leightern@xxxxxxx
From: <russlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: russlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: russlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [va-bird] Re: Ivory Billed
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 1:57:00 -0500
>Once again my apologies. I am using a new PDA browser that does not display web pages well. I actually found the correct article by Dr. Jackson who now claims he did not ever withdraw his dispute. He also now claims his colleagues only provisionally withdrew their challenge for other reasons [keeping the discovery valid would spur conservation efforts in the area of the discovery] and now more or less are re-asserting their doubts.
>
>Each reader wlll have to draw their own conclusions..Some of Jackson's concerns about audio spoofing seem as far-fetched and illogical as he claims the Cornell conclusions are. His
>video concerns
appear valid but he gives minimal credit to what the observers saw with their own eyes.
>
>Of more concern is who is right. If Jackson is correct then Cornell jumped the gun and anti-conservation forces have a field day. If he is wrong then the appearance of academic rivalry might distract the task at hand-hard confirmation of the bird's existence.
>
>I hope this is resolved soon. And again -apologies for the mixup on the articles. Correct link www.aou.org and scroll to Jackson's article.
>-----Original Message-----
>
>From: <russlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subj: [va-bird] Ivory Billed
>Date: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:54 am
>Size: 355 bytes
>To: va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Sorry-here is the website that reported on the dispute of the siting withdrawn. www.inventas.co.nz/50rarestbirds/ivory.htm.
>
>Russ
Lay
>Nags Head NC
>
>You are subscribed to VA-BIRD. To post to this mailing list, simply send email to va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to
>va-bird-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field.
>
>
>
>You are subscribed to VA-BIRD. To post to this mailing list, simply send email to va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to
>va-bird-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field.
>
You are subscribed to VA-BIRD. To post to this mailing list, simply send email to va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to
va-bird-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field.
Other related posts:
- » [va-bird] Ivory Billed
- » [va-bird] Re: Ivory Billed
- » [va-bird] Re: Ivory Billed
- » [va-bird] Ivory Billed
- » [va-bird] Re: Ivory Billed
- » [va-bird] Ivory Billed
We just need to clone these LordGod birds Jurassic Park style. Install them in a various wildlife refuges across the deep south and thus create a environmental renaissance of epic proportions. Can you click a clone?
W
William Leigh
Bridgewater VA
leightern@xxxxxxx
Bridgewater VA
leightern@xxxxxxx
From: <russlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: russlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: russlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [va-bird] Re: Ivory Billed
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 1:57:00 -0500
>Once again my apologies. I am using a new PDA browser that does not display web pages well. I actually found the correct article by Dr. Jackson who now claims he did not ever withdraw his dispute. He also now claims his colleagues only provisionally withdrew their challenge for other reasons [keeping the discovery valid would spur conservation efforts in the area of the discovery] and now more or less are re-asserting their doubts.
>
>Each reader wlll have to draw their own conclusions..Some of Jackson's concerns about audio spoofing seem as far-fetched and illogical as he claims the Cornell conclusions are. His
>video concerns appear valid but he gives minimal credit to what the observers saw with their own eyes.
>
>Of more concern is who is right. If Jackson is correct then Cornell jumped the gun and anti-conservation forces have a field day. If he is wrong then the appearance of academic rivalry might distract the task at hand-hard confirmation of the bird's existence.
>
>I hope this is resolved soon. And again -apologies for the mixup on the articles. Correct link www.aou.org and scroll to Jackson's article.
>-----Original Message-----
>
>From: <russlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subj: [va-bird] Ivory Billed
>Date: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:54 am
>Size: 355 bytes
>To: va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Sorry-here is the website that reported on the dispute of the siting withdrawn. www.inventas.co.nz/50rarestbirds/ivory.htm.
>
>Russ Lay
>Nags Head NC
>
>You are subscribed to VA-BIRD. To post to this mailing list, simply send email to va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to
>va-bird-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field.
>
>
>
>You are subscribed to VA-BIRD. To post to this mailing list, simply send email to va-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to
>va-bird-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field.
>