[tri-wings] Re: SV: insensitive relatives- rambling
- From: Jpfrench199@xxxxxx
- To: tri-wings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 09:57:58 EDT
In a message dated 7/26/01 4:38:02 PM Central Daylight Time,
Thebonehamfamily@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> if
> she had breathed just a few breaths-whether that would have made a
>
Sharon,
It's almost like she isn't really their grandaughter because she was
stillborn (gosh, I HATE that word).
I wonder sometimes if this is just their (mine and Amy's families) way of
handling Jessica's loss. I know that they go out to the cemetary to visit her
but they don't like to talk about it. If the subject comes up we hear "I know
you don't want to hear this, but you're probably better off." NO CRAP!!!!!!
If he knows that we don't want to hear it ( and he definately knows), then
why does he insist on saying it? I know that they go out to the cemetary on
Jessie's birthday......why can't they just once tell us that they are
thinking about their grandaughter? What is the big deal? Just because she
isn't here doesn't mean that she never existed or that she is any less
important than their other grandchildren. And on the other side if I mention
Jessica's name then the comparison always comes up of losing her parish
priest. Granted, he was a very special man and like a member of the family
but he was in his late 70's and was not her child. What is the comparison? Am
I being unreasonable and close-minded when I think that there are no
similarities. I know that her and dad miss him and I definately don't want to
take anything away from their memory of him.....but don't compare his death
to the loss of our child!
Jim, husband of Amy, daddy of Mandy- 8, Katie- 4, and Jessica Nicole- our
precious angel who we love dearly ( full T18, 4-21-99 )
Pensacola, Florida U.S.A.
visit us at: http://www.challengenet.com/~trisomy/french.htm
ICQ # 52193165 AOL IM : jimamy199 Yahoo IM :
jpfrench99
Building ___ooOOoo__ Rainbows
www.trisomyonline.org
Families Helping Families On-line
- Follow-Ups:
- [tri-wings] Re: SV: insensitive relatives- rambling
- From: Sharon Boneham
Other related posts:
- » [tri-wings] Re: SV: insensitive relatives- rambling
- » [tri-wings] Re: SV: insensitive relatives- rambling
- » [tri-wings] Re: SV: insensitive relatives- rambling
- [tri-wings] Re: SV: insensitive relatives- rambling
- From: Sharon Boneham