[tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- From: Katie Cragg <kmcragg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tri-med@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:08:37 -0500
Barb
If I remember correctly, I think they only looked at like 60 cells or
something like that. I think that was just a prelim. Test though. Not sure
what they did for the "official" test. But, with those 1st 60-it already had
come back that not all of the cells were affected...therefore they assumed
Mitchell was mosaic. I'm guessing that if the full 60 came back all t13,
they would've assumed he was "full t13". I am not a genetic expert at
all...:) I wish I knew more. :) And understood more.
Katie
Mom to Mitchell t13 mosaic
On 6/27/06 6:39 PM, "Barbara Farlow" <b_farlow@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Any genetics experts out there? Does anyone know how many cells etc that
> need to be counted to rule out mosaicism? Does anyone know from their own
> testing? Just curious. Thanks Barb Mom to Annie 05/25/05-08/12/05
> Building ___ooOOoo__ Rainbows
> www.trisomyonline.org
> Families Helping Families On-line
>
Building ___ooOOoo__ Rainbows
www.trisomyonline.org
Families Helping Families On-line
- Follow-Ups:
- [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- From: Gary Comparetto
- References:
- [tri-med] mosaic vs. full trisomy
- From: Barbara Farlow
Other related posts:
- » [tri-med] mosaic vs. full trisomy
- » [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- » [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- » [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- » [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- » [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- » [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- » [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- » [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- » [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- » [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- [tri-med] Re: mosaic vs. full trisomy
- From: Gary Comparetto
- [tri-med] mosaic vs. full trisomy
- From: Barbara Farlow