[tri-med] Low Set Ears
- From: "Karen" <karens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Tri-Med" <tri-med@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:53:47 +1000
I havent caught up on all my mail but I saw a reference to low set ears and I
thought it may help everyone if I clarified just what that means because I have
found that many people don't really understand it and therefore don't see low
set ears when they are there. I will endeavour to draw a picture and put it up
on the web but my own artistic skills are not the best.
Understandably many people think that low set ears means that the ears are
placed low on the side of the head, low being lower than "normal" or to be
politically correct lower than the average child. While thats true its actually
not accurate because its also subjective and most people measure it or "see" it
as being from the bottom of the ear. Thats where the big mistake occurs.
When a doctor determines if ears are low set what he does first is to measure
the length of the external ear. He will then draw a line (imaginary) from the
inner canthi of the eye to the parietal apex. The ear is low set (definite) if
the point WHERE THE EAR JOINS THE HEAD is BELOW that imaginary line. The bottom
of the ear does NOT come into the equation except in determining if the childs
ears are smaller than average.
To clarify even further - the inner canthi is the inner corner of the eye -
right next to the lacrimal duct. The parietal apex is that part of the skull
thats really prominant in T-18'ers and stops them laying on the back of their
head, its the "point" at the back of the head.
When a doctor says that the ears are somewhat low set he means that the ear is
smaller and that the amount of ear above that imaginary line is less than 2
standard deviations for other children of the same gestational age.
There are tables, but an experienced neonatologist will be able to "eyeball" a
childs ear and know if its low set or not. And thats why "we" as lay people
often don't see the "low set" ears that the doctors describe.
Alex is really interesting in that regard and I will try and find an OLD
picture of it to put up the web so you can see it. But Alex is mosaic and like
a lot of T-18 mosaicers one side of his face is very different to the other. In
Alex's case one eye is lower than the other eye. Its not so noticeable when you
look at his eyes unless you are looking for it, but its really noticeable with
his ears.
Both his ears are low set when you draw that imaginary line from the inner
canthi to the parietal apex but only if its drawn from the eye that is on the
same side as the ear. I guess what I am saying is that both ears are the same
if you take the reference point as being his eye, but because one eye is lower
than the other if you compare the position of each ear to the other ear one is
a good couple of inches lower than the other these days. Its something that
they can correct to some degree when the "make" him some new ears, but they
cant fix it totally and they certainly can't change the position of his eyes
without reconstructing the bones of his entire face and its not that big a
problem that I would even consider it (or let him consider it!!!).
What do low set ears mean? In themselves nothing - absolutely nothing. Its a
very very minor cosmetic anomaly that can be corrected if need be once the
childs ear stops growing (about age 8). BUT if a child has low set ears and any
other minor anomaly, such as widely spaced eyes, curved fingers, anything, the
chances of the child having a major problem as well is very high.
Additionally any child with low set ears and especially if they are deformed in
any way, even if its really minor like a thicker "roll" at the top of the ear,
or even a thinner "roll" then the child should always have a full abdominal
ultrasound to determine if there are any kidney issues.
Ears? Kidneys? what the heck do they have in common? I know thats a question
that I asked when Alex was born and they insisted on a renal ultrasound when he
was 2 days old because of his funky ears.
No its not the fact that they are both kidney shaped (though thats interesting)
Its because in utero the ears develop at the same time as the kidneys and other
major organs. If there is a problem with the ears (which is easily seen) then
its reasonable to suspect that whatever caused the ears to be different may
have also effected the other major organs that were developing at the same time
(which may not be so easily seen).
A child with low set ears, or if they are deformed in any way should also be
screened regularly for hearing problems for the first few years of life.
I hope that helps clarify exactly what low set ears are.
Life consists not in holding good cards but in playing those you hold well.
-- Josh Billings
Keep Looking For Rainbows!!
_--_|\
/Karen \
\ _.--._ /
v Karen, Mum to Alex (11 years, T-18 Mosaic)
http://members.optushome.com.au/karens
Building ___ooOOoo__ Rainbows
www.trisomyonline.org
Families Helping Families On-line
- Follow-Ups:
- [tri-med] Re: Low Set Ears
- From: jwaite
- [tri-med] Re: Low Set Ears
- From: Ruth Hadley
- [tri-med] Re: Low Set Ears
- From: Michelle Prieto
Other related posts:
- » [tri-med] Low Set Ears
- » [tri-med] Re: Low Set Ears
- » [tri-med] Re: Low Set Ears
- » [tri-med] Re: Low Set Ears
- [tri-med] Re: Low Set Ears
- From: jwaite
- [tri-med] Re: Low Set Ears
- From: Ruth Hadley
- [tri-med] Re: Low Set Ears
- From: Michelle Prieto