[tri-med] Re: IEP
- From: "Karen" <karens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tri-med@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:29:40 +1100
----- Original Message -----
From: "jwaite"
> That horse left the barn years ago. Alex first evaluation (testing that is
> called for by the 3 yr re-evaluation process) includes an IQ test. This
> was
> all done by the school.
>
> That particular thought process was missed by me early on. :-(
Its not too late. Don't allow the school to do another though. IQ scores do
change as our kids get older, thats why they want another. Unfortunately for
our kids, because they learn slower their IQ's change more dramatically,
usually lower, so I wouldnt let them do it again. The older one that they
have will probably be the "better" one.
My advice would be to pay if you have to, but get it done yourself and be in
control of who gets what out of it. No one needs their IQ scores, they do
however need the individual section results.
> To be perfectly honest the final score is totally invalid if there is a
wide
> variation between verbal and performance scores. Or even if there is a
score
> that falls way outside the average for that child. Yet they can still give
a
> final acore and often do.
What do we as parents 'do' in this situation?
If there is a large discrepancy between any score then its an indication of
a specific disability. eg my younger daughters IQ test showed that she had a
very high IQ (over 130) but there was a huge discrepancy with her auditory
section (every other area scored very high, auditory she scored "average")
indicating at the very least that she processed written instruction better
than verbal, so high school was not her best learning place. Further testing
revealed what would be known as CAPD these days. So for her to do her very
best she would need remediation.
Alex has a similar discrepancy because of his hearing loss (and diagnosed
CAPD). However he also had a large discrepency between long term and short
memory activities. Indicating that he does not have "retardation" but rather
that he benefits from repetition and that he will recall later, he just has
difficulty recalling things immediately. So exams set with additional time
etc are better for him.
Those sort of things are the whole reason for doing the neuro psych in the
first place - not the IQ score. Discrepancies bring their total score down
and skew the information gathered. In short Mandy's IQ was probably much
higher and would be if she was retested after remediation. But who cares?
She was always and still is a dumb smart person and I would trade dumb smart
anyday - they are the survivors of the world.
The supreme happiness of life is the conviction that we are loved.
-- Victor Hugo
Keep Looking For Rainbows!!
_--_|\
/Karen \
\ _.--._ /
v Karen, Mum to Alex (10 years, T-18 Mosaic)
http://members.optushome.com.au/karens
Building ___ooOOoo__ Rainbows
www.trisomyonline.org
Families Helping Families On-line
- Follow-Ups:
- [tri-med] Re: IEP
- From: Catherine Trewin
- References:
- [tri-med] Re: IEP
- From: NanlorW
- [tri-med] Re: IEP
- From: Karen
- [tri-med] Re: IEP
- From: jwaite
Other related posts:
- » [tri-med] IEP
- » [tri-med] IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- » [tri-med] Re: IEP
- [tri-med] Re: IEP
- From: Catherine Trewin
- [tri-med] Re: IEP
- From: NanlorW
- [tri-med] Re: IEP
- From: Karen
- [tri-med] Re: IEP
- From: jwaite