[tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- From: SHAMOND73@xxxxxxx
- To: tri-med@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:05:26 EST
wow, karen ! you always have so much great information. how do i get these
Omega oils for Jason, do you know what product it is in in the states??
do you know what this behind schedule myelinazation means for Jason without
the omega's??....did you get a prognosis from it, because of course i did not
!
Sharon mom to Jason T17M
In a message dated 1/28/2008 12:27:02 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
karens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
----- Original Message -----
From: <SHAMOND73
> apparently you can do it without sedation, if your child is sleeping and
> does not move !!!! i can't see that working !
Alex has never had sedation for an ABR and he has had about 1 dozen. No I
apologise - he had sedation for the ABR in Utah with Dr Carey.
They dont actually have to be asleep, just still. With the last ABR that
Alex had he watched videos on TV for the audiologist.
When he was a baby though we would schedule the appointment for first thing
in the morning then I would wake him at 3am and not let him go back to sleep
until the ABR. When it was time I would simply feed him and then go into our
"sleeping" ritual (me singing and stroking his head). The ABR's often took
longer to do because frequently they would get one ear done and then he
would wake so we would have to reschedule the second ear.
Because Alex had central apneas they wouldnt sedate him (sedation increases
the likliehood of apneas) so it was the way we always did it.
> i spoke to the audiologist today and she said there was some type of
> electrical interference and now that she was looking over the results more
> closely,
> she sees that maybe it is not a moderate loss, but a mild-moderate loss,
> but
> she won't know for sure until she does the test again.
Ahhhh - another one!!!
Alex has this sort of response with his ABR and we have finally figured it
out - its only taken 13 years!!
Lets see if I can simplify the complex story. Alex acted as if he was
profoundly deaf when he was a baby, yet I was aware that he could hear. So
we tried and tried and tried to get hearing results done but they never made
sense. Each type of test was consistent but the different tests weren't. (so
all the ABR's were the same. all the VROA's were the same - its just the ABR
and the VROA were so very different)
In short the ABR's said that he had a moderate / severe loss, the VROA's
said no it was a mild / moderate loss, the echog and OAE's said profound -
confusing!! So what was it and why were they so different.
The VROA was the most accurate at picking up the mechanical hearing loss -
that is what he "could" physically hear but the ABR was also picking up the
fact that he had CAPD (Central Auditory Processing Disorder). So whilst his
ear could hear the sound and it got the brain OK there was a delay in the
brain processing the sound and therefore producing the brain wave that the
ABR measures. That explained why Alex responded to sound better than he
responded to speech.
I knew that Alex had CAPD but the audiologists here refused to acknowledge
that CAPD even existed. CAPD as a diagnosis is relatively "new" (last 15
years or so) so its not well understood. More recently audiologists have
begun researching CAPD and so have started to understand it better. For the
very first time the audiologist actually admitted that Alex had CAPD in a
report late last year and she actually used the ABR's as proof.
So like Jason, Alex's ABR's always made his hearing seem worse than it was
because it was picking up the CAPD (interference) - if Jason is like Alex
then his mechanical hearing is probably the better than the ABR is showing.
The good news is that they think that only people with higher cortical
functioning can exhibit CAPD. The bad news is that little can be done for
CAPD.
Alex's CAPD Is probably due in part to the fact that he has ACC or more
accurately dysgenesis of the corpus callosum. When they did his MRI no one
made a big deal out of the fact that his corpus callosum was so different to
the rest of the world - they simply said that it was there just thin. But it
has caused most of his problems.
>>they did see that the mylenization was a little immature, a little behind
> schedule in its development........so we'll see.
Poor myelination is also common in T-18. Myelin is made up of long chain
fats - so if you havent already start the EFA's (essential fatty acids also
known as Omega fats) EFA's are so essential to brain development that they
now add them to all baby formula, but I have been advocating them for our
kids long before that. I specifically use Efalex but the US folk can share
the brands that they are using.
As a babe I always gave Alex fish for the EFA's but when the supplements
came out I started him on the Efalex. Within 6 months Alex had started
talking. Coincidence? maybe but I believe the EFA's played a big part. If I
stop them his teachers ask whats wrong with him as he regresses, not so that
you can say "he stopped this or that" but more a general seeing that he's
not doing as well as he was. To me thats proof that the EFA's make a
difference.
Life consists not in holding good cards but in playing those you hold well.
-- Josh Billings
Keep Looking For Rainbows!!
_--_|\
/Karen \
\ _.--._ /
v Karen, Mum to Alex (12 years, T-18 Mosaic)
http://members.optushome.com.au/karens
Building ___ooOOoo__ Rainbows
www.trisomyonline.org
Families Helping Families On-line
**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
Building ___ooOOoo__ Rainbows
www.trisomyonline.org
Families Helping Families On-line
- Follow-Ups:
- [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- From: Karen Schuler
Other related posts:
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- » [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- [tri-med] Re: Hearing Loss
- From: Karen Schuler