[tri-med] Re: Evidence-based medicine
- From: "Karen Schuler" <karens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tri-med@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:16:30 +1000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nanci Grimes"
>> Everyone agreed that this term throughout the medical community is a
>> method of sharing knowledge improving health care.
I agree Nanci,
Evidence based medicine is essentially what western or modern medicine is.
Its the reason that John Carey worked so hard to get those early studies
done to show that our children aren't in a vegetative state, that they reach
milestones. Because it provides evidence. There is of course good and bad in
it - it means that we can't ignore the Atlanta study on cardiac care. Its
why we must keep the research going and get it to cover LARGE numbers of our
children not isolated case studies.
From what I have seen of private medical care in the US its pretty much all
provided on evidence based medicine.
In real terms I guess it means that they wont cover things such as growth
hormone therapy for cognitive improvement (no research, or limited research
to support that) but you will get growth hormone therapy for GHD. Similarly
you probably wont get HBO or chinese herbs for fertility.
I agree with Neil on the fact that we always have to see what the laws
actually say - if we could take politicians at their word or for their
promises it would be a vastly different world that we live in. I was worried
about the "hype" of the new wording for those proposed changes to Aussie law
on disabled parking until I actually read the proposed laws. I was worried
that kids and folks like Alex would be excluded because though dont use
wheelchairs but still need proximity parking because of equipment - the law
covers that - and will cover a lot of the folk the hype was saying would be
excluded.
Karen
(mum to Alex T-18 mosaic, 14 years and counting the sleeps till we go away)
Building ___ooOOoo__ Rainbows
www.trisomyonline.org
Families Helping Families On-line
Other related posts: