[tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- From: "G&S" <hardyboyz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tri-med@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:45:17 -0400
>>>>>> Of course its not always infallible as a 16
year old can have a baby with a chromosomal anomaly as much as a 40 year
old. Its just that the odds are greater for the 40 year old woman.<<<<<<<<
just to clarify the occurrence in young moms
that said the odds are greater for the 40 yr old but more young women have
babies with chromosome issues because more young women have babies then 40
year olds percentage wise and the young ones are not always tested or refuse
the testing
Susan Mom to Rebecca T18 M 6/6/91-5/2/06 and Mark ADD/LD age 16
Building ___ooOOoo__ Rainbows
www.trisomyonline.org
Families Helping Families On-line
- References:
- [tri-med] Re: switched to med: low bone mass
- From: Katy Roberts
- [tri-med] Do you think this suspicious?
- From: D McHugh
- [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- From: Karen
- [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- From: Magdalena E Hudson
- [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- From: Karen
Other related posts:
- » [tri-med] Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- » [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- [tri-med] Re: switched to med: low bone mass
- From: Katy Roberts
- [tri-med] Do you think this suspicious?
- From: D McHugh
- [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- From: Karen
- [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- From: Magdalena E Hudson
- [tri-med] Re: Do you think this suspicious?
- From: Karen