[tn-moths] Re: moth-er
- From: "Jean Obrist" <innisfreehorses@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:53:25 -0500
Good point. Will use moth-er. I figured mother was better than leper. Jean
Obrist
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Stedman
To: tn-butterflies@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:10 AM
Subject: [tn-moths] archiving those precious lep data
As most of you already know, one of the most important offerings of NABA is
its Butterflies I've Seen (BIS) data-entry program, where for absolutely free
you can archive all of your butterfly data. You can do this by entering the
number of each species you see during a trip, or you can do this by entering
just an X for each species; either way, the resulting data are always
accessible to you personally, and there may eventually be ways in which the
data will be made publicly accessible in lists, maps, etc.
As far as I know, there is no equivalent data-entry program for moth data, an
oversight that needs to be corrected somehow if I am correct about the absence
of such a program. If you know of such, please share with the TN-Moths
listserv subscribers, so that these important data can be archived for the use
of future generations of moth-ers. [May I recommend that we use moth-er instead
of mother when using the term in messages to TN-Moths?]
Hoping to hear from someone in the know about a moth archiving database.
Good lepping, Steve Stedman
Cookeville (Putnam County)
Other related posts:
- » [tn-moths] Re: moth-er - Jean Obrist
