[TN-Bird] Re: NY Times Article on Ivory-billed Controversy

Below is the whole article.  Available at 
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/21/science/21bird.html.  You'll need to be 
registered.


Chuck Nicholson
Norris, TN

New York TImes
July 21, 2005
3 Biologists Question Evidence in Sighting of Rare Woodpecker
By ANDREW C. REVKIN
Three biologists are questioning the evidence used by a team of bird experts 
who made the electrifying claim in April that they had sighted an ivory-billed 
woodpecker, a bird presumed to have vanished from the United States more than 
60 years ago, in the swampy forests of southeast Arkansas. 

If the challenge holds up, it would undermine not only a scientific triumph - 
the rediscovery of a resplendent bird that had been exhaustively sought for 
years - but also significant new conservation expenditures in the region.

The paper questioning the discovery has been provisionally accepted by a 
peer-reviewed journal, which could post the analysis online within a few weeks. 
But the paper will be accompanied by a fierce rebuttal by the team that 
announced the discovery, and a response to that rebuttal by the challengers.

The expected publication of the paper and the rebuttal was confirmed in 
interviews and e-mail exchanges with two authors of the challenge, Richard O. 
Prum and Mark B. Robbins, ornithologists at Yale and the University of Kansas, 
as well as with two members of the team that reported finding the woodpecker. 

The third author of the new paper is Jerome A. Jackson, a zoologist at Florida 
Gulf Coast University and the author of the book, "In Search of the 
Ivory-Billed Woodpecker," published in 2004. 

"In my opinion," Mr. Jackson wrote in an e-mail message on Wednesday, "the data 
presented thus far do no more than suggest the possibility of the presence of 
an ivory-billed woodpecker. I am most certainly not saying that ivory-billed 
woodpeckers are not out there. I truly hope that the birds do exist in Arkansas 
or elsewhere and have been championing this idea for a long time."

Both groups of scientists declined to name the journal or to discuss the 
details of the challenge and the response until they were published.

But they made it clear that the debate revolves around four seconds of fuzzy 
videotape that, by chance, captured a bird with sweeping white-and-black wings 
as it darted from its perch on the far side of a tupelo tree in April 2004 and 
flicked over swampy waters before vanishing in the trees 11 wing beats later. 

That video clip was just one piece in a pile of drawings, recordings and other 
evidence collected in more than a year of searching and deploying cameras and 
listening devices across the vast swampy reaches of the Cache River National 
Wildlife Refuge. 

Altogether, the original research team, led by scientists from Cornell 
University and the Nature Conservancy, compiled seven sightings, including the 
video, as well as recordings of a "double knock" sound typical of the 
ivory-billed bird. 

But only the video was potentially solid enough to confirm for the wider 
ornithological community the existence of the bird, the authors said in various 
statements at the time.

Everyone agrees that the bird that appears on the tape is either an 
ivory-billed woodpecker or a pileated woodpecker, a slightly smaller bird that 
is relatively common. Both species have a mix of white and black plumage. 
However, the ivory-billed woodpecker has a white trailing edge to its wings 
while the pileated woodpecker has a black trailing edge. 

The team that conducted the original search for the bird ran extensive tests, 
including recreating the scene captured in video using flapping, hand-held 
models of the two types of woodpecker. They concluded that the plumage patterns 
seen in the grainy image could only be that of the ivory-billed woodpecker. 

The authors of the new paper disagree. 

Only extended scientific discussion - or new pictures of the bird from 
additional searches - will determine whose view will prevail. Another intensive 
scientific search of the region is scheduled to begin in November, Cornell 
officials said. 

"The people who originally announced this thoroughly believe they got an 
ivory-billed woodpecker," Dr. Robbins said in an interview. Determining if a 
species has crossed the threshold of extinction often requires decades of 
observation to ensure that no stray individuals have found a reclusive 
hideaway. 

Supposedly extinct species have been rediscovered with some frequency over the 
last century. One famed example is the coelacanth, a huge fish known only from 
fossils for generations but then caught by African anglers.

In the case of the ivory-billed woodpecker, a magnificent bird with a 30-inch 
wingspan and a red crest, determining that it has not become extinct has proved 
equally daunting. Individual birds were widely dispersed, and the woodpecker 
shared habits and habitat with the pileated woodpecker. 

Van Remsen of Louisiana State University, an expert on the woodpecker and a 
member of the team that reported finding the ivory-billed species, said he 
remained confident of the discovery. 

"We can counter everything," he said. "We stick to our guns." 

The announcement of the bird's apparent discovery came on April 28, when the 
scientists' findings were published in the online version of the journal 
Science. 

The announcement thrilled conservationists, who saw the bird as the perfect 
symbol around which to build an invigorated protection plan for woodland 
habitat in the Southeast, which harbors a rich array of wildlife and plants. 

The Bush administration used the reported sightings in Arkansas to promote its 
"cooperative conservation" philosophy. The day the rediscovery was publicized, 
the administration announced a variety of initiatives, including a plan to pay 
more than $13 million to landowners within the region's floodplains who plant 
and maintain forests. 

John W. Fitzpatrick, the co-leader of the search for the bird and director of 
the Cornell University Laboratory of Ornithology, said it was normal for 
scientists to disagree about evidence of this sort, especially because in this 
case the video in question was "pretty crummy." 

But he said that extensive analysis was done and redone to eliminate the 
possibility that the bird was a pileated woodpecker. 

Dr. Fitzpatrick added that there was "significant additional evidence right 
now" that would be published in coming months. 

He declined to comment on the challengers' assertions, saying any discussion 
could jeopardize publication of the exchange of papers on the video. 

**************************************************
> 
> From: OLCOOT1@xxxxxxx
> Date: 2005/07/20 Wed PM 11:54:29 EDT
> To: missbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  ARBIRD-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 
>       tn-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,  albirds@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [TN-Bird] NY Times Article on Ivory-billed Controversy
> 
>  
> Here is the beginning of the article on the Ivory-billed controversy which  
> will appear tomorrow.  
> The three authors of the submitted paper are Richard Prum and Mark Robbins  
> plus Jerome Jackson.  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
> 3 Biologists Question Evidence in Sighting of Rare Woodpecker 
> By ANDREW C. REVKIN 
> Published: July 21, 2005 
> Three biologists are questioning the evidence used by a team of bird  
> experts who made the electrifying claim in April that they had sighted  
> an ivory-billed woodpecker, a bird presumed to have vanished from the  
> United States more than 60 years ago, in the swampy forests of 
> southeast  Arkansas.  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> The Cannons will roar!!! 
> 
> Good  Birding!!!
> 
> Jeff R. Wilson
> OL'COOT / TLBA
> Bartlett,  TN
> 
> 
> 

=================NOTES TO SUBSCRIBER=====================

The TN-Bird Net requires you to sign your messages with
first and last name, city (town) and state abbreviation.
-----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
To post to this mailing list, simply send email to:
tn-bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------- 
To unsubscribe, send email to:
tn-bird-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  TN-Bird Net is owned by the Tennessee Ornithological Society 
       Neither the society(TOS) nor its moderator(s)
        endorse the views or opinions expressed
        by the members of this discussion group.
 
         Moderator: Wallace Coffey, Bristol, TN
                 wallace@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
     Visit the Tennessee Ornithological Society
          web site at http://www.tnbirds.org
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Topographical Maps located at http://topozone.com/find.asp
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    ========================================================

Other related posts: