[THIN] Re: ram

1 weird app.  running the exe on another server instead of installing on
each server.  they just point a shortcut to \\server\path\exe and drop it in
everyone's profile. i think installing it on the servers would help.

they are running 4.5 advanced.  no mem or cpu goodies.

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> any weirdo apps? memory opt enabled? ctfmon killed?
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Greg Reese <gareese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> these are ibm x336,
>>
>> dual 3ghz processors, 4bg ram, but they fall apart at 20 users.  w2k3 r2.
>> sp2. ps 4.5 adv.
>>
>> they think they should get more users per server.  so do i.
>>
>> i am suspicious of the app setup on one of the apps.  and they have a lot
>> of symantec junk installed.  plus all the tricerat stuff.  simplify
>> profiles, printing, reliability etc.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 9:20 PM, <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Exactly, some blades for example do this just as is done on lower end
>>> desktops with integrated video chipsets......
>>>
>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From*: "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> *Date*: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:14:11 -0700
>>> *To*: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> *Subject*: [THIN] Re: ram
>>>
>>> Because the system is sucking up a bunch of it before the OS starts
>>> (PCI-X, video, etc)…  You can get some of it back by using the /PAE switch
>>> (yes, even on standard) to map that memory back.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Greg Reese
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, August 31, 2008 7:01 PM
>>> *To:* Thin
>>> *Subject:* [THIN] ram
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> why would a server have 4096mb of ram installed but only report 3455mb
>>> installed?  i am looking over some servers for a friend of mine and this
>>> seems odd.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts: